Showing posts with label Shakespeare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shakespeare. Show all posts

Thursday, May 15, 2014

Chris Hedges - The Power of Imagination

This is an interesting article from Chris Hedges - posted at TruthDig. Rather than the usual political analysis and criticism, here he waxes somewhat philosophical. However, he demonstrates a bit of the pre/trans fallacy that is an aspect of integral theory. Here is the key quote:
Only this premodern ethic can save us as we enter a future of economic uncertainty and endure the catastrophe of climate change. Social and economic life will again have to be communal. The lusts of capitalism will have to be tamed or destroyed. And there will have to be a recovery of reverence for the sacred, the bedrock of premodern society, so we can see each other and the earth not as objects to exploit but as living beings to be revered and protected. This means inculcating a very different vision of human society.
Yes, we need a deeper and more embodied sense of the sacred, but we do NOT need a return to the premodern ethic. The premodern worldview is characterized by magical thinking, superstition, and the lack of an essential, rational consciousness capable of post-formal thinking (symbolic thought as opposed to belief in power gods and correlations between human actions and forces of nature).

The best known example of this is the difference in how God is depicted in the Old Testament (wrathful, jealous, angry, punitive) and the God of the New Testament, as embodied in Jesus (loving, centered in justice, inclusive). The first is pre-rational, the later is rational.

What we need is a transpersonal, post-rational model of the sacred as a way to embody purpose in meaning in nature as something other than physical material to be exploited.

The Power of Imagination

Posted on May 11, 2014
By Chris Hedges
 

John William Waterhouse’s painting “Miranda—The Tempest.”

Those in the premodern world who hoarded possessions and refused to redistribute supplies and food, who turned their backs on the weak and the sick, who lived exclusively for hedonism and their own power, were despised. Those in modern society who are shunned as odd, neurotic or eccentric, who are disconnected from the prosaic world of objective phenomena and fact, would have been valued in premodern cultures for their ability to see what others could not see. Dreams and visions—considered ways to connect with the wisdom of ancestors—were integral to existence in distant times. Property was communal then. Status was conferred by personal heroism and providing for the weak and the indigent. And economic exchanges carried the potential for malice, hatred and evil: When wampum was exchanged by Native Americans the transaction had to include “medicine” that protected each party against “spiritual infection.”

Only this premodern ethic can save us as we enter a future of economic uncertainty and endure the catastrophe of climate change. Social and economic life will again have to be communal. The lusts of capitalism will have to be tamed or destroyed. And there will have to be a recovery of reverence for the sacred, the bedrock of premodern society, so we can see each other and the earth not as objects to exploit but as living beings to be revered and protected. This means inculcating a very different vision of human society.

Our greatest oracles have sought to impart this wisdom. William Shakespeare lamented the loss of the pagan rituals eradicated by the Reformation. When Shakespeare was a boy, the critic Harold Goddard pointed out, he experienced the religious pageants, morality plays, church festivals, cycle plays, feast and saint days, displays of relics, bawdy May Day celebrations and tales of miracles that made up the belief system during the reign of the medieval Catholic Church. The Puritans, the ideological vanguard of the technological order, would eventually ban or greatly weaken all of these, and they made war on the Elizabethan and Jacobean theaters for celebrating these premodern practices. The London authorities in 1596 prohibited the public presentation of plays within city limits. Theaters had to relocate to the south side of the River Thames. The Puritans, in power under Cromwell in 1642, closed the London theaters. In Puritan New England at about the same time the authorities banned games, revels and “harlotry plays.” In 1644 the Puritans tore down Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre. Within four years all other theaters in and around London had been destroyed. The Puritans understood, in a way that is perhaps lost to us today, that Shakespeare subverts modernity.

Shakespeare portrays the tension between the premodern and the modern. He sees the rise of the modern as dangerous. The premodern reserved a place in the cosmos for human imagination. The new, modern, Machiavellian ethic of self-promotion, manipulation, bureaucracy and deceit—personified by Iago, Richard III and Lady Macbeth—deformed human society. Shakespeare lived during a moment when the modern world—whose technology allowed it to acquire weapons of such unrivaled force that it could conquer whole empires, including the Americas and later China—instilled through violence this new secular religion. He feared its demonic power.

Oracles were revered in premodern societies. These oracles were in touch with realities and forces that lay beyond the empirical. All societies have oracles—such as Thomas Paine, Emma Goldman, W.E.B. Du Bois and James Baldwin in the United States—but in a modern society they are pushed to the margins, ridiculed and often persecuted. Those who spoke out of their vision quests in Native American society, or from Delphi in ancient Greece, did not employ the cold, clinical language of science and reason. They spoke, rather, in the nebulous language of love, tenderness, patience, justice, redemption and forgiveness. They paid homage, and called on us to pay homage, to the mysterious incongruities of human existence. A society that loses its respect for the sacred, that ignores its oracles and severs itself from the power of human imagination, ensures its obliteration.

Reason makes possible the calculations, science and technological advances of industrial civilization. But reason does not lift us upward to the heavens. It does not bring us into contact with the sacred. It does not permit us to curb our self-destructive urges. Herman Melville, Fyodor Dostoevsky, Emily Dickinson, Marcel Proust, William Faulkner, James Joyce, Samuel Beckett, Lorraine Hansberry and August Wilson mocked the myth of human progress and the folly of hubris. They, like Shakespeare, warned that conflating technological advancement with human progress deforms us.

Prospero in Shakespeare’s “The Tempest” is master of an enchanted island where he has absolute power. He keeps the primitive Caliban and the spirit Ariel as his slaves. The play is about liberty, love and the capacity for awe. It reminds us that the power unleashed in the wilderness can prompt us to good if we honor the sacred but to monstrous evil if we do not. There are few constraints in the wilderness, a theme that would later be explored by the novelist Joseph Conrad. Imagination triumphed in “The Tempest” because those who were bound to their senses and lusts were subjugated. However, overseas in the American colonies, as Shakespeare knew, the poison of dark passions embodied by the Calibans and evil dukes of the world had unleashed an orgy of greed, theft and genocide.

Those who worship themselves, the essence of the modern, commit spiritual suicide. In love with himself after seeing his reflection in a pond, Narcissus is doomed, as many in the modern world are, by vanity, celebrity and the need for admirers and sycophants. Narcissists master the arts of manipulation, seduction, power and control. They eschew empathy, honesty, trust and transparency. It is a form of mental illness.

It is through imagination that we can reach the dark regions of the human psyche and face our mortality and the brevity of existence. It is through imagination that we can recover reverence and kinship. It is through imagination that we can see ourselves in our neighbors and the other living organisms of the earth. It is through imagination that we can envision other ways to form a society. The triumph of modern utilitarianism, implanted by violence, crushed the primacy of the human imagination. It enslaved us to the cult of the self. And with this enslavement came an inability to see, the central theme of “King Lear.” Imagination, as Goddard wrote, “is neither the language of nature nor the language of man, but both at once, the medium of communion between the two—as if the birds, unable to understand the speech of man, and man, unable to understand the songs of birds, yet longing to communicate, were to agree on a tongue made up of sounds they both could comprehend—the voice of running water perhaps or the wind in the trees. Imagination is the elemental speech in all senses, the first and the last, of primitive man and of the poets.”

All of the great visionaries and leaders of the Indian tribes, from medicine men like Black Elk and Sitting Bull to warriors such as Crazy Horse, in the presence of the natural world heard it speak to them, in the same way it spoke to Shakespeare, Dickinson or Walt Whitman. All elements of life, especially those that lie beyond articulation, infuse the human imagination. The communion—accentuated by vision quests, the sanctity of dreams, odd occurrences, miracles and the wonder of nature, as well as rituals that take place within a communal society—blurs the lines between the self and the world. This ability to connect with the sacred is what Percy Shelley meant when he wrote that poetry “lifts the veil from the hidden beauty of the world and makes familiar things as if they were not familiar.” We are reminded at that moment of the wonder of life and our insignificance in the vastness of the cosmos, reminded that, as Prospero said, “we are such stuff as dreams are made on.” Too often this wisdom comes too late, as it does when Othello stands over the dead Desdemona or Lear over his executed daughter, Cordelia. This wisdom makes grace possible. Songs, poetry, music, theater, dance, sculpture, art, fiction and ritual move human beings toward the sacred. They clear the way for transformation. The prosaic world of facts, data, science, news, technology, business and the military is cut off from the mysteries of creation and existence. We will recover this imagination, this capacity for the sacred, or we will vanish as a species. 


The World As It Is: Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress

A collection of Truthdig Columns by Chris Hedges

Keep up with Chris Hedges’ latest columns, interviews, tour dates and more at www.truthdig.com/chris_hedges.

Sunday, February 03, 2013

18 Animations of Classic Literary Works: From Plato and Shakespeare, to Kafka, Hemingway and Gaiman

From Open Culture, a unique collection of animated videos based on great works of literature. I particularly liked Shel Silverstein's The Giving Tree and an animated mash-up of the spirits of Franz Kafka and Hunter S. Thompson.

18 Animations of Classic Literary Works: From Plato and Shakespeare, to Kafka, Hemingway and Gaiman


December 12th, 2012

Yesterday we featured Piotr Dumala’s 2000 animation of Fyodor Dostoyevsky’s classic novel, Crime and Punishment, and it reminded us of many other literary works that have been wonderfully re-imagined by animators — many that we’ve featured here over the years. Rather than leaving these wondrous works buried in the archives, we’re bringing them back and putting them all on display. And what better place to start than with a foundational text — Plato’s Republic. We were tempted to show you a claymation version of the seminal philosophical work (watch here), but we decided to go instead with Orson Welles’ 1973 narration of The Cave Allegory, which features the surreal artistic work of Dick Oden.
Staying with the Greeks for another moment … This one may have Sophocles and Aeschylus spinning in their graves. Or, who knows, perhaps they would have enjoyed this bizarre twist on the Oedipus myth. Running eight minutes, Jason Wishnow’s 2004 film features vegetables in the starring roles. One of the first stop-motion films shot with a digital still camera, Oedipus took two years to make with a volunteer staff of 100. The film has since been screened at 70+ film festivals and was eventually acquired by the Sundance Channel. Separate videos show you the behind-the-scenes making of the film, plus the storyboards used during production.
Between 1992 and 1994, HBO aired The Animated Shakespeare, which brought to life 12 famous Shakespeare plays. Leon Garfield, a well-known British children’s author, wrote the scripts, mainly using Shakespearian language. And some talented Russian artists did the animation. Above, we give you the first part of the animated Romeo & Juliet. Get Part 2 and Part 3 here, and find other animated Shakespeare plays on this Youtube Channel.
Eight years before Piotr Dumala tackled Dostoyevsky’s Crime and Punishment, Dumala produced a short animated film based on The Diaries of Franz Kafka. Once again, you can see his method, known as “destructive animation,” in action. It’s well worth the 16 minutes. Or you can spend time with this 2007 Japanese animation of Kafka’s cryptic tale of “A Country Doctor.” And if you’re still hankering for animated Kafka, don’t miss Orson Welles’ Narration of the Parable, “Before the Law”.
The animated sequence above is from the 1974 film adaptation of Herman Hesse’s 1927 novel SteppenwolfIn this scene, the Harry Haller character played by Max von Sydow reads from the “Tractate on the Steppenwolf.” The visual imagery was created by Czech artist Jaroslav Bradác.
In 1999, Aleksandr Petrov won the Academy Award for Short Film (among other awards) for a film that follows the plot line of Ernest Hemingway’s classic novella, The Old Man and the Sea (1952). As noted here, Petrov’s technique involves painting pastels on glass, and he and his son painted a total of 29,000 images for this work. Rather incredible. It’s permanently listed in our collection of Oscar Winning Films Available Online and our collection of 500 Free Movies Online.
Italo Calvino, one of Italy’s finest postwar writers, published Italian Folktales in 1956, a series of 200 fairy tales based sometimes loosely, sometimes more strictly, on stories from a great folk tradition. Upon the collection’s publication, The New York Times named Italian Folktales one of the ten best books of the year.  And more than a half century later, the stories continue to delight. Case in point: in 2007, John Turturro, the star of numerous Coen brothers and Spike Lee films, began working on Fiabe italiane, a play adapted from Calvino’s collection of fables. The animated video above features Turturro reading “The False Grandmother,” Calvino’s reworking of Little Red Riding Hood. Kevin Ruelle illustrated the clip, which was produced as part of Flypmedia’s more extensive coverage of Turturro’s adaptation. You can find another animation of a Calvino story (The Distance of the Moon) on YouTube here.
Emily Dickinson’s poetry is widely celebrated for its beauty and originality. To celebrate her birthday (it just passed us by earlier this week) we bring you this little film of her poem, “I Started Early–Took My Dog,” from the “Poetry Everywhere” series by PBS and the Poetry Foundation. The poem is animated by Maria Vasilkovsky and read by actress Blair Brown.
E.B. White, beloved author of Charlotte’s WebStuart Little, and the classic English writing guide The Elements of Style, died in 1985. Not long before his death, he agreed to narrate an adaptation of “The Family That Dwelt Apart,” a touching story he wrote for The New Yorker. The 1983 film was animated by the Canadian director Yvon Malette, and it received an Oscar nomination.
Shel Silverstein wrote The Giving Tree in 1964, a widely loved children’s book now translated into more than 30 languages. It’s a story about the human condition, about giving and receiving, using and getting used, neediness and greediness, although many finer points of the story are open to interpretation. Today, we’re rewinding the videotape to 1973, when Silverstein’s little book was turned into a 10 minute animated film. Silverstein narrates the story himself and also plays the harmonica.
The online bookseller Good Books created an animated mash-up of the spirits of Franz Kafka and Hunter S. Thompson. Under a bucket hat, behind aviator sunglasses, and deep into an altered mental state, our narrator feels the sudden, urgent need for a copy of Kafka’s Metamorphosis. Unwilling to make the purchase in “the great river of mediocrity,” he instead makes the buy from “a bunch of rose-tinted, willfully delusional Pollyannas giving away all the money they make — every guilt-ridden cent.” The animation, created by a studio called Buck, should easily meet the aesthetic demands of any viewer in their own altered state or looking to get into one.
39 Degrees North, a Beijing motion graphics studio, started developing an unconventional Christmas card last year. And once they got going, there was no turning back. Above, we have the end result – an animated version of an uber dark Christmas poem (read text here) written by Neil Gaiman, the bestselling author of sci-fi and fantasy short stories. The poem was published in Gaiman’s collection, Smoke and Mirrors.
This collaboration between filmmaker Spike Jonze and handbag designer Olympia Le-Tan doesn’t bring a particular literary tale to life. Rather this stop motion film uses 3,000 pieces of cut felt to show famous books springing into motion in the iconic Parisian bookstore, Shakespeare and Company. It’s called  Mourir Auprès de Toi. Are there impressive literary animations that didn’t make our list? Please let us know in the comments below. We’d love to know about them.

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Harold Bloom: Criticism and Self-Influence


Harold Bloom is one of the two or three greatest living literary critics, Sterling Professor of the Humanities at Yale University, and a former Charles Eliot Norton Professor at Harvard. His more than thirty books include The Best Poems of the English Language, The Art of Reading Poetry, and The Book of J. He is a MacArthur Prize Fellow, a member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters, and the recipient of many awards and honorary degrees, including the Academy's Gold Medal for Belles Lettres and Criticism, the International Prize of Catalonia, and the Alfonso Reyes Prize of Mexico.

FORA.tv hosted a two-part lecture from Harold Bloom called "Criticism and Self-Influence."

Part One:





Part Two:



Summary
The Ph.D. Program in Comparative Literature is proud to announce the launch of its series Critical Theory Today with two major talks by preeminent literary scholar and critic Harold Bloom. Professor Bloom, who is Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale University, will deliver lectures on two consecutive Mondays, March 19 and March 26.

Titled "Criticism and Self-Influence," focusing on his readings of Whitman in his first lecture and of Shakespeare in his second, these lectures are contributions to Bloom's intellectual biography. They will give a sense of how Harold Bloom reads, what stirs his mind, what he looks for, and what he projects on a text. With so impressive a list of works to his credit, Bloom will assess not only his impact on the world of literary criticism, but also his vision as a man of letters who has taught us how to think about that one subject that will always challenge our ability to think: art.

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Putting Hamlet on Trial in the 21st Century

Interesting idea - this would have been fun to participate in, especially when we read Hamlet back in college. It certainly would have been fun to watch. I'd have to question the impartiality of the reporter/narrator - events may have been misrepresented for dramatic impact.

From the LA Times Culture Monster blog.

To be sane or not to be sane? For Hamlet, a question still unanswered


Melancholydane A Southern California jury decided on Monday that Hamlet, prince of Denmark, was mentally sound at the time he allegedly stabbed royal adviser Polonius to death, and can be tried for murder.

Never mind that the (fictional) crime happened something like 400 years ago. And that most of the evidence was drawn from the poetic words of William Shakespeare.

Even in Shakespeare, it appears, there is no statute of limitations on murder.

The mock court took place more than an ocean and several generations away from Hamlet's home: the University of Southern California campus, where the Shakespeare Center of Los Angeles held the trial in a strange anachronism of centuries-old literature meeting the modern American legal system, and the event ended up hanging somewhere in the ether between the two.

The defendant (played by Graham Hamilton) looked spry and young for someone in his fourth century of life. The bailiff wore the tunic of an old-world guard, and the acronym of the DSM4 — the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the directory of mental ailments used by psychologists — was renamed the Danish Statistical Manual.

Hamlet was prosecuted by attorneys from Los Angeles, acting on behalf of the crown; he was defended by lawyers from Beverly Hills.

Justicekennedy Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy swapped his perch on the highest court in the land for a folding table draped in a black cloth. Clearly a Shakespeare enthusiast, he presided over the trial with a discerning eye, his hands folded in front of him and a halo of stage light ringing his head.

The jury was a collection of 12 (plus two alternates) that ranged from high school and college students to Academy Award-winning actress Helen Hunt.

Before them was a simple question that had long proved difficult to answer: What was the mental state of Hamlet in the time leading up the killing of Polonius? Or, as his defense attorney, Blair Berk, phrased it in her opening statements: “Is Hamlet to be sane or not to be sane at the time in question? That is the question.”

Berk contended he was not: Hamlet was struck by grief, after the death of his father, King Hamlet, while he was away at university. He became even more distraught when his mother, Gertrude, married her late husband’s brother, Claudius, soon after his death. It was said that the union came so swiftly that the meats from the funeral were still good for the wedding celebration. (On top of all that, Hamlet was bitten by a serpent too.)

The defense argued that Hamlet suffered from a "major depressive episode," or melancholia. He was, Berk said, a “still brilliant but decompensated man.”

The fatal stab to Polonuis was a "stroke of impulse,” she said. “Hamlet had tragically succumbed to a disease of the mind when he allegedly committed this crime.”

The prosecution agreed that Hamlet was, indeed, a brilliant man — that’s exactly why he’s claiming to be insane now. It was the method by which he tried to manipulated his way into the throne he thought was rightfully his, countered Danette Meyers, a prosecuting attorney (by day, she’s a veteran of the L.A. county district attorney’s office).

“He was not insane, he was grieving,” she said. “He was cunning, he was cold, he was calculating.” What he wanted, she added, was revenge.

Much of the debate concerned the symptoms of such a melancholia — loss of mirth, change in weight and so forth — and whether he appeared to have them. Also, the ghost of his father, of course, had a great deal of bearing: What meaning, if any, can be divined from a spirit seeming to pop up everywhere, according to Shakespeare’s documentation, yet only offer commands to his son?

All big hurdles for a jury to cross as they pondered his mental state. After the jury received its instructions and left to deliberate, a projector flickered on and a screen descended from above, providing a fourth wall, if you will, into a typically sequestered process.

The jurors batted around the question in a thoughtful and passionate conversation that never quite became contentious. One woman had a spacey look in her eyes. Another juror seemed to roll his eyes when someone made a comment that he must have thought was foolish.

A woman at the other end of the table cautioned not to hold the DSM4, a clinical manual cobbled together by psychologists, as some sort of sacrosanct text. And, she added: “Just because he’s pretending to be insane doesn’t mean he’s not insane.”

Hunt questioned the motives of Shakespeare. She wondered how many liberties Shakespeare took as a playwright in covering the events that purportedly transpired, as well as Hamlet’s mental state through it all. (As she spoke, she squinted her eyes, seeming to look through her fellow jurors, as if she wasn’t joining a discussion but having a soliloquy like ones that attorneys on both sides quoted so generously to make their case.)

Before the deliberations had wrapped, the screen coiled back into the ceiling, leaving a cliffhanger.

Because of the compacted nature of the evening, the jurors did not have to come to a unanimous decision. And they didn’t: 10 believed Hamlet to be sane, thus able to be held criminally culpable; two did not. Thirty-three minutes of deliberation, it appears, wasn’t enough time to answer a question of justice that has lingered for more than 400 years.
-- Rick Rojas

Top: Hamlet (Graham Hamilton), right, sits quietly as his attorneys Blair Berk and Richard G. Hirsch, have a discussion during "The Trial of Hamlet" at USC's Bovard Auditorium. Bottom, the judge presiding over Hamlet's trial was Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who entered the courtroom as announced by crier J.B. Waterman, right. Credit: Christina House / For The Times