Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts
Showing posts with label propaganda. Show all posts

Thursday, February 06, 2014

Americans Need to Eat More Whole Grains, According to General Mills

general mills brands banner

Uh, <cough> bullshit <cough>. That was my first thought when I saw the headline, then I read the article and saw that the researchers and the funding came from General Mills, you know, the people whose livelihood is based on Americans consuming a LOT of grains. They own brands such as Cheerios, Betty Crocker, Gold Medal (flour), Wheaties, and tons of other crap.

There is one point in the article that is valid - Americans do not get enough fiber in their diets. However, we do NOT need to eat more grains to get more fiber - we need to eat more fibrous vegetables, such as broccoli, asparagus, celery, pumpkin and other squashes, and so on, as well as beans and lentils.

Oh, one last point. I eat ZERO whole grains (or any other kind of grain) and I get around 40 grams of fiber each day on average. Americans have been seriously mislead by the agricultural industry into thinking we need grains (whole or otherwise) in our diet - and the USDA has been their enabler for more than 30 years.

Here is the whole article - as you read it please keep in mind who funded the "research." This should have been posted as an advertorial.

Americans need to eat more whole grains, study suggests

By Shereen Jegtvig
Wed Feb 5, 2014


General Mills cereals are displayed on a kitchen counter in Golden, Colorado December 17, 2009. Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

(Reuters Health) - Most children and adults in the U.S. are getting less than the recommended amounts of whole grains and dietary fiber, according to a recent study.

Researchers found people who did eat the recommended three or more servings of whole grains each day also tended to consume the most fiber.

Whole grains are present in some types of hot and cold cereal and bread. Previous studies have tied whole grain intake to a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes and heart disease among adults. The health benefits are in part attributed to the fiber in whole grains.

"Most people do not consume whole grains in amounts that can be most beneficial, also many people, even health professionals, are confused about the relationship between whole grain and fiber," Marla Reicks told Reuters Health in an email.

Reicks led the study at the University of Minnesota in St. Paul. Her coauthors are all affiliated with General Mills, which funded the study.

Eating fiber, Reicks said, has been linked to better gut health, less heart disease and lower weights. Fiber is found in whole grains in varying quantities as well as in fruits, vegetables and beans.

Dietary guidelines from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services say at least half of all grains consumed should be whole grains. That works out to a minimum of three one-ounce servings per day for adults and some kids.

Fiber recommendations vary by age. Young kids need 19 to 25 grams of fiber each day while older kids, teens and adults need anywhere from 21 to 38 grams per day.

Reicks and her colleagues compared whole grain and dietary fiber intakes among Americans ages two and up using a large national nutrition and health survey. They included data from 9,042 people surveyed in 2009 and 2010.

The study team discovered 39 percent of children and teens and 42 percent of adults consumed no whole grains at all. Only 3 percent of children and teens and about 8 percent of adults ate at least the recommended three servings per day.

The researchers also found people who ate the most whole grains had the highest fiber intakes: on average, 24.5 grams per day for kids and 28 grams per day for adults, according to findings published in Nutrition Research.

Children who ate the recommended amount of whole grains were 59 times more likely to be in the top third of fiber consumers, compared to those who ate no whole grains. Adults who met the whole grain recommendations were 76 times more likely to get the most fiber.

Major sources of whole grains for study participants included breakfast cereal, breads and rolls, oatmeal and popcorn.

Reicks said people should strive to eat whole grain versions of breads, oatmeal and breakfast cereals when possible.

She said having only whole grain versions of those foods available at home will help children see that they are tasty, usual foods and build habits that may last into older childhood and adulthood.

Consumers can read labels and look for a special whole grain stamp when shopping.

"Some products indicate the whole grain content in grams on the label, which is very useful if you know how much whole grain is needed to count as a serving, and some use the whole grain stamp (The Whole Grains Council), but not all," Reicks said. Stamped products are explained on the group's Website here: bit.ly/1kchZ1J.

Reicks added that until labeling is made consistent, a good method is to look at a food's ingredient list. If the first ingredient is whole grain, the product will probably contain enough of it to count as a whole grain product.

"The study reinforces the preponderance of scientific evidence and supports the recommendations set forth by many dietary guidelines advisory committees within the U.S. and throughout the globe," Roger Clemens told Reuters Health in an email.

Clemens, from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, was an adviser for the most recent government-backed U.S. dietary guidelines. He was not involved with the study.

Clemens said there are many reasons why people do not meet dietary recommendations for fiber, including taste and texture of whole grain products. Another reason is that high-fiber foods tend to cause gas.

He noted that different sources of dietary fiber contain different types of fiber, including soluble and insoluble fiber.

"This is important since different types of dietary fiber have different functions in our bodies," he said.

Whole grains are equally complex, Clemens added. He said oats are among the whole grains highest in fiber.

SOURCE: bit.ly/1aolUp5 Nutrition Research, online January 17, 2014.

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Rolling Stone - How Roger Ailes Built the Fox News Fear Factory



Rolling Stone has done a pretty good profile on Roger Ailes, the man behind the Fox News propaganda machine, the man who made "news" a four letter word. Even Rupert Murdoch seems to think Ailes is a little crazy - and is afraid of him (Ailes has more connections and more power than Murdoch, despite having less money).

How Roger Ailes Built the Fox News Fear Factory

The onetime Nixon operative has created the most profitable propaganda machine in history. Inside America's Unfair and Imbalanced Network

By Tim Dickinson
May 25, 2011

At the Fox News holiday party the year the network overtook archrival CNN in the cable ratings, tipsy employees were herded down to the basement of a Midtown bar in New York. As they gathered around a television mounted high on the wall, an image flashed to life, glowing bright in the darkened tavern: the MSNBC logo. A chorus of boos erupted among the Fox faithful. The CNN logo followed, and the catcalls multiplied. Then a third slide appeared, with a telling twist. In place of the logo for Fox News was a beneficent visage: the face of the network’s founder. The man known to his fiercest loyalists simply as "the Chairman" – Roger Ailes.

“It was as though we were looking at Mao,” recalls Charlie Reina, a former Fox News producer. The Foxistas went wild. They let the dogs out. Woof! Woof! Woof! Even those who disliked the way Ailes runs his network joined in the display of fealty, given the culture of intimidation at Fox News. “It’s like the Soviet Union or China: People are always looking over their shoulders,” says a former executive with the network’s parent, News Corp. “There are people who turn people in.”

This article appears in the June 9, 2011 issue of Rolling Stone. The issue will be available on newsstands and in the online archive May 27.

The key to decoding Fox News isn’t Bill O’Reilly or Sean Hannity. It isn’t even News Corp. chief Rupert Murdoch. To understand what drives Fox News, and what its true purpose is, you must first understand Chairman Ailes. “He is Fox News,” says Jane Hall, a decade-long Fox commentator who defected over Ailes’ embrace of the fear-mongering Glenn Beck. “It’s his vision. It’s a reflection of him.”

Photo Gallery: Roger Ailes, GOP Mastermind

Ailes runs the most profitable – and therefore least accountable – head of the News Corp. hydra. Fox News reaped an estimated profit of $816 million last year – nearly a fifth of Murdoch’s global haul. The cable channel’s earnings rivaled those of News Corp.’s entire film division, which includes 20th Century Fox, and helped offset a slump at Murdoch’s beloved newspapers unit, which took a $3 billion write-down after acquiring The Wall Street Journal. With its bare-bones news­gathering operation – Fox News has one-third the staff and 30 fewer bureaus than CNN – Ailes generates profit margins above 50 percent. Nearly half comes from advertising, and the rest is dues from cable companies. Fox News now reaches 100 million households, attracting more viewers than all other cable-news outlets combined, and Ailes aims for his network to “throw off a billion in profits.”

Slideshow: An hour-by-hour look at how Fox disguises GOP talking points as journalism

The outsize success of Fox News gives Ailes a free hand to shape the network in his own image. "Murdoch has almost no involvement with it at all," says Michael Wolff, who spent nine months embedded at News Corp. researching a biography of the Australian media giant. "People are afraid of Roger. Murdoch is, himself, afraid of Roger. He has amassed enormous power within the company – and within the country – from the success of Fox News."

Read about the GOP's dirty war against Obama

Fear, in fact, is precisely what Ailes is selling: His network has relentlessly hyped phantom menaces like the planned “terror mosque” near Ground Zero, inspiring Florida pastor Terry Jones to torch the Koran. Privately, Murdoch is as impressed by Ailes’ business savvy as he is dismissive of his extremist politics. "You know Roger is crazy," Murdoch recently told a colleague, shaking his head in disbelief. "He really believes that stuff."

Read the whole long, depressing article.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Darren Allen - This is the News: A Beginner’s Guide to Democratic Mind Control

This article from Eat the State was posted back in October, but it's good and will be relevant for years to come. By the way, Eat the State is a cool site - anti-authoritarian political opinion, research, and humor - and they are a not-for-profit, so donations gladly accepted.

This is the News: A Beginner’s Guide to Democratic Mind Control

By Darren Allen • on October 22, 2010 1:02 pm

You may have noticed, while reading The Guardian, Le Monde or The New York Times, that no mention is ever made of the fundamental cause of conflict, the origin and nature of history, the best way to experience the centre of the universe while making love, how another person can really be known, what death has in common with asking a girl out, how to be free of worry, what to do if you accidentally find yourself trapped in a prison, school or office, why things don’t go haywire anymore, what the coming world catastrophe has in common with cellular biology, why a beautiful shoe will always be beautiful, how to enhance empathy, why we have placed birth and death in the hands of experts, what trees have in common with improvised theatre, why mystery and irrational generosity are illegal, the secret connection between modern art and corporate wealth-maximising and what all this has in common with formality, play, metaphor, the oldest meaning of the word god, the colour of Tuesday and why we smile when we meet a friend. Finally no mention is ever made of the reason why these, and thousands of other illuminating topics, never find their way into the pages of the news-media; why the reader has to look elsewhere for a beginner’s guide to democratic mind control…

The Propaganda Model

It is impossible to read the truth in the news. Truth, as Noam Chomsky and Edward Herman identified in their 1988 study of media bias, “Manufacturing Consent,” is not edited out of the news directly, through threats and censorship, but indirectly, through systemic filters which unconsciously reward those who can unconsciously censor themselves. In order to reach positions of power and responsibility, successful and established journalists (like members of parliament, head teachers at good schools, and senior managers at wealthy companies) have to either a) serve long apprenticeships, b) succeed at the “best” universities, c) have “connections” or d) be wealthy. Ideally all four.

a) A long apprenticeship (working one’s way up from local papers, through lowly sub-editing positions to the coveted position of journalist) demonstrates that one is a dependable “team player” and shares editorial “values”. The surface P.R. meaning of these terms is that journalists must be “competent and mature writers” (which indeed must, usually, be the case). The unspoken functional meaning, however, is that the journalist must not criticise the system she works for. She must not submit articles on subservience to professional authority, for example, or on media complicity in corporate crime; she must instead confine her copy to a strict (but unspoken) framework of permitted thoughts and approved topics.

b) Success at a world-class university has much the same effect as a long period of apprenticeship, demonstrating an ability to be subservient to specialised and professional power (the teacher), subservient to abstract external authority (the syllabus), and to be able to process large quantities of data without recourse to meaning (truth, beauty, quality, etc – which are seen as “relative” by schools and universities); to internalise, in other words, the idea that truth originates from received theory and a mediated environment, and not from one’s own direct lived experience.

c) Having connections in mass-media demonstrates that one already comes from a family or a circle of intimates which adheres to corporate or postmodern values; and d) having wealth confers useful skills (through an extended expensive education, unpaid internships, etc), a useful arrogance and an establishment-friendly ideological view of the world.

Successful wealthy, well-connected, well-educated journalists who are “team players” and who share company “values”, unconsciously adhere to systemic filters which frame, emphasise, omit and transform facts in order to serve system and self. These system-serving filters ensure that success is only conferred to those journalists who: 1. do not criticise their newspaper or television company; 2. do not criticise the corporations that own the newspaper or fund it through advertising; 3. source their information principally from agents of power and figures of authority (think tanks, government sources, councillors, lawyers, etc); 4. bend to legal, financial or publicity threats, complaints and criticisms from established power; and, 5. who have an ideological belief in “free markets”, “anti-terrorism”, “full employment” “defence” and “democracy”. Individuals or parties within government can be criticised, and the left-liberal press occasionally allows slightly more dissenting voices to criticise corporations, but the entire system and its core values cannot be brought into question.

The Ego Model

Adherence to systemic filters is an unconscious process. Consciously the news reporter believes he is telling the truth, reporting facts and providing a professional service. Unconsciously he is motivated by ego. In other word, the news is first framed, edited and guided by five self-serving psychological filters. Subtler and more fundamental than systemic filters, and largely ignored by dissident news-critics, the “ego model” has a much wider reach, affecting not just straight news reporting, but also comment, analysis, creative output, book reviews and cultural commentary.

Ego here refers to the thinking “I” and the feelings it generates in the body: the mental-emotional self which creates, through memory and expectation, a definite and personal sense of time and space. For young children, many ancient hunter-gatherer societies and neolithic man this self is a soft thing, meaning that it comes and goes as needed, like a tool. When one needs to think or project into the past or future, the ego is there, but for much of the time, it is quiet, leaving a rich and intimate experience of the directly experienced present moment, or context, perceived not as an objective screen viewed by a separate subjective and relative self, but as a vivid and mysterious, yet simple absolute whole to which the self is sensitive, or empathic.

Empathy comes from the Greek for “letting in feeling”. When self “lets in” what is actually happening in the present moment it becomes silent. With the ordinary self silent, experience becomes extraordinary; without (or with a less definite sense of) time and space. The boundary between ‘my self’ and ‘others’ becomes fluid; I find I can share other’s feelings and that I become more sensitive to complex atmospheres and subtle qualities.
Go read the whole article.