Moral Coherence and Principle PluralismCitation:
Patricia Marino, University of Waterloo Department of Philosophy
August 14, 2012
Journal of Moral Philosophy (2013)
This paper develops and defends a conception of moral coherence that is suitable for use in contexts of principle pluralism. I argue that, as they are traditionally understood, coherence methods stack the deck against pluralist theories, by incorporating norms such as systematicity – that the principles of a theory should be as few and as simple as possible. I develop and defend an alternative, minimal, conception of coherence that focuses instead on consistency. It's been suggested that consistency in this context should aim at the avoidance of conflict, but I argue against this: what matters is "case consistency," or judging consistently from one case to another. This means judging in accordance with morally relevant similarities and differences. I defend my proposal of minimal coherence from objections having to do with complexity and arbitrariness.
Marino, P. (2013) Moral Coherence and Principle Pluralism. Journal of Moral Philosophy. DOI: 10.1163/17455243-4681032. Available at SSRN.
Sep 19 2013
- From Essays in Philosophy, a special issue on Cartesian virtue and freedom.
- Josh May (Monash): Does Disgust Influence Moral Judgment?
- Ryan Conree Preston-Roedder (UNC): A Better World.
- Alexander Peysakhovich (Harvard) and David G. Rand (Yale): Habits of Virtue: Creating Norms of Cooperation and Defection in the Laboratory.
- Patricia Marino (Waterloo): Moral Coherence and Principle Pluralism.
- Leon R. Calleja (Brooklyn): Reconciling the Self and Universalism.
- Benjamin M. Eidelson (Yale): Treating People as Individuals.
- David O. Brink (UCSD): Situationism, Responsibility, and Fair Opportunity.
- Cristian Constantinescu (Birkbeck): Moral Vagueness: A Dilemma for Non-Naturalism.
- Zachary Horne (Illinois): Belief Updating in Moral Dilemmas.
- Michael Lynch (UConn): Truth in Ethics.
- Graham Hubbs (Idaho): Answerability without Answers.
- Thomas Scanlon on what is morality.
- Are intelligent people better at morality? Katja Keuchenius on whether good brains reach high moral stages.
- Bernard Yack reviews Aristotle's Politics: Living Well and Living Together by Eugene Garver.
- Crowding out virtues: JP O’Malley interviews Michael J. Sandel.
- From Bleeding Heart Libertarians, a symposium on Michael Huemer’s The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey.
- You're joking, right, you haven't really made a musical based on John Rawls’s A Theory of Justice, have you?