NPR - Don't Throw It Out: 'Junk DNA' Essential In Evolution

The notion of junk DNA always seemed rather naive to me. We barely understand what the we are looking at and we are prepared to call large portions of it junk? Massive FAIL in my opinion. At least now they are figuring out their error.

Don't Throw It Out: 'Junk DNA' Essential In Evolution


by Joe Palca
Listen to the Story


All Things Considered
[3 min 45 sec]


Download


August 19, 2011


There's a revolution under way in biology. Scientists are coming to understand that genetics isn't just about genes. Just as important are smaller sequences of DNA that control genes.


These so-called regulatory elements tell genes when to turn on and off, and when to stop functioning altogether. A new study suggests that changes in these non-gene sequences of DNA may hold the key to explaining how all species evolved.


To better understand this revolution in biology, we have to go back about a century. At that time, the notion of a gene was fairly simple. A gene was responsible for a particular trait.


"There was a gene for blue eyes, a gene for curly hair, etc.," says Gregory Wray, a geneticist at Duke University. But genes were just a concept in those days. Nobody really knew what a gene looked like. That changed in 1953, when James Watson and Francis Crick showed that genes were made of DNA, and that DNA was the chemical that allowed genes to be passed from parent to child.


"We came to understand a gene as a stretch of DNA that codes for a protein, and the protein is involved in producing that trait, whatever we're interested in — eye color, hair and so forth," says Wray.


Biologists spent the latter half of the 20th century exploring the steps involved in turning genetic instructions inside a stretch of DNA into something the body needs to survive. They wrote tens of thousands of papers explaining how genes make proteins, what proteins do, what piece of DNA codes for a particular protein. "And now we're coming to realize that that's only half the picture," says Wray. Many scientists are now shifting their attention to the other half of the picture.


Regulating Genes


Wray says there are about 20,000 genes in the human genome, but as many as 1 million of these so-called regulatory elements, so scientists have a lot to do.


Early work suggests these elements may play an important role in diseases. Craig Lowe, a genetics researcher at Stanford University, says these regulatory elements are also important in how different species evolved.


"It may not necessarily always be changing in the genes, or gains of genes or losses of genes, that are causing interesting adaptations. But it's how these genes are regulated," says Lowe.


Even a small change in when a gene is switched on as an animal is growing can have a major impact on the animal's size and shape.


Lowe and geneticist David Haussler from the University of California, Santa Cruz, have a paper in Science this week describing how some of these regulatory elements have changed over hundreds of millions of years of evolution.


"There are many genes that have changed remarkably little between a mouse and a human, for example, and yet they behave differently within the cell, and that's largely due to the way they are regulated differently," says Haussler.


Like many revolutions, only a handful of people saw this one coming. David Stern, a geneticist with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, says as recently as two decades ago, scientists had little interest in the DNA that wasn't part of a gene.


"We used to call this junk DNA, and it's perfectly obvious now what we used to call junk DNA is actually chock-filled with the information that builds out organisms," says Stern.


Geneticists still think a lot of our DNA is junk. Makes you wonder if there are any other undiscovered treasures in all that junk that might spawn the next revolution in biology.