Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization
- Douglas Haddow
- | 29 Jul 2008
I‘m sipping a scummy pint of cloudy beer in the back of a trendy dive bar turned nightclub in the heart of the city’s heroin district. In front of me stand a gang of hippiesh grunge-punk types, who crowd around each other and collectively scoff at the smoking laws by sneaking puffs of “fuck-you,” reveling in their perceived rebellion as the haggard, staggering staff look on without the slightest concern.
The “DJ” is keystroking a selection of MP3s off his MacBook, making a mix that sounds like he took a hatchet to a collection of yesteryear billboard hits, from DMX to Dolly Parton, but mashed up with a jittery techno backbeat.
“So… this is a hipster party?” I ask the girl sitting next to me. She’s wearing big dangling earrings, an American Apparel V-neck tee, non-prescription eyeglasses and an inappropriately warm wool coat.
“Yeah, just look around you, 99 percent of the people here are total hipsters!”
“Are you a hipster?”
“Fuck no,” she says, laughing back the last of her glass before she hops off to the dance floor.
Ever since the Allies bombed the Axis into submission, Western civilization has had a succession of counter-culture movements that have energetically challenged the status quo. Each successive decade of the post-war era has seen it smash social standards, riot and fight to revolutionize every aspect of music, art, government and civil society.
But after punk was plasticized and hip hop lost its impetus for social change, all of the formerly dominant streams of “counter-culture” have merged together. Now, one mutating, trans-Atlantic melting pot of styles, tastes and behavior has come to define the generally indefinable idea of the “Hipster.”
An artificial appropriation of different styles from different eras, the hipster represents the end of Western civilization – a culture lost in the superficiality of its past and unable to create any new meaning. Not only is it unsustainable, it is suicidal. While previous youth movements have challenged the dysfunction and decadence of their elders, today we have the “hipster” – a youth subculture that mirrors the doomed shallowness of mainstream society.
* * *
Take a stroll down the street in any major North American or European city and you’ll be sure to see a speckle of fashion-conscious twentysomethings hanging about and sporting a number of predictable stylistic trademarks: skinny jeans, cotton spandex leggings, fixed-gear bikes, vintage flannel, fake eyeglasses and a keffiyeh – initially sported by Jewish students and Western protesters to express solidarity with Palestinians, the keffiyeh has become a completely meaningless hipster cliché fashion accessory.
The American Apparel V-neck shirt, Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Parliament cigarettes are symbols and icons of working or revolutionary classes that have been appropriated by hipsterdom and drained of meaning. Ten years ago, a man wearing a plain V-neck tee and drinking a Pabst would never be accused of being a trend-follower. But in 2008, such things have become shameless clichés of a class of individuals that seek to escape their own wealth and privilege by immersing themselves in the aesthetic of the working class.
This obsession with “street-cred” reaches its apex of absurdity as hipsters have recently and wholeheartedly adopted the fixed-gear bike as the only acceptable form of transportation – only to have brakes installed on a piece of machinery that is defined by its lack thereof.
Lovers of apathy and irony, hipsters are connected through a global network of blogs and shops that push forth a global vision of fashion-informed aesthetics. Loosely associated with some form of creative output, they attend art parties, take lo-fi pictures with analog cameras, ride their bikes to night clubs and sweat it up at nouveau disco-coke parties. The hipster tends to religiously blog about their daily exploits, usually while leafing through generation-defining magazines like Vice, Another Magazine and Wallpaper. This cursory and stylized lifestyle has made the hipster almost universally loathed.
“These hipster zombies… are the idols of the style pages, the darlings of viral marketers and the marks of predatory real-estate agents,” wrote Christian Lorentzen in a Time Out New York article entitled ‘Why the Hipster Must Die.’ “And they must be buried for cool to be reborn.”
With nothing to defend, uphold or even embrace, the idea of “hipsterdom” is left wide open for attack. And yet, it is this ironic lack of authenticity that has allowed hipsterdom to grow into a global phenomenon that is set to consume the very core of Western counterculture. Most critics make a point of attacking the hipster’s lack of individuality, but it is this stubborn obfuscation that distinguishes them from their predecessors, while allowing hipsterdom to easily blend in and mutate other social movements, sub-cultures and lifestyles.
Offering multiple perspectives from many fields of human inquiry that may move all of us toward a more integrated understanding of who we are as conscious beings.
Monday, August 04, 2008
Hipster: The Dead End of Western Civilization
A cool article from Adbusters. Does the lack of meaning that informs the core of "hip culture" spell the end of Western Civilization as we know it, or is this just another case of the boy who cried wolf?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Wow, what a poignant article. Being a 22 yr old in Austin, and having recently been to Portland (= "The American Apparel V-neck shirt, Pabst Blue Ribbon beer and Parliament cigarettes"), I can say that these words hit the nail on the head. I have many friends who could be defined as "hipster," some more grudgingly than others. Friends around my age have given up on social/political infrastructure so thoroughly that it's cool to not care about anything but getting fucked up.
However, I do have some hipster-y friends who are not apathetic, like ones involved with Oxfam. But still, the I-pay-to-look-disheveled gaze finds me on every street. In their defense, speaking at least for my friends, they see the broad phenomenon of 'hipsterdom' as the only viable alternative to popped-polo-collar fratty douche syndrome.
Sadly, walking through the 50,000+ student campus of UT, there is a smaller middle ground than you'd like to think. Still, I'm in there somewhere going about my day.
Haven't we heard this all before? I remember back in the 80s how we were criticized for having nothing to fight for, nothing to care about except getting an MBA, and how dare we shop in thrift stores out of some fake allegiance to the homeless!
And when rave culture and Nirvana came along, there was the same hand-wringing.
I wonder if I don't detect, as one person in the article mentioned, a hidden agenda by those critics of hipsters? I wish I knew how old they are and what generation they belong to. It might be irrelevant, but there's this idea that unless you grew up in the 60s and were a war-dodging hippie, you don't know jack.
Even if the author's point is valid, why blame the young people? They have only inherited a world/culture the rest of us created. And the fact that we're focusing on the fashion and partying as indicators of anything is itself shallow. If Western culture has reached a dead-end, we're all to blame.
Post a Comment