It's not too surprising then that the author of the study, Dr. David Amodio, chose to respond in a venue where his work is understood and not distorted for political motives.
I like your blog – it’s important to a have a critical voice out there. However, given how this study has been misconstrued and sensationalized in the media, as well as among science bloggers, it’s important to address the criticisms directly. Though I’ve generally not worried about the “lay” coverage (how can you argue science with pundits?), it might be worthwhile to respond to a blog that is read by neuroscientists (including myself from time to time).
He goes on to address five criticisms of the study. The Neurocritic also adds his own response to Amodio's comments.
Read the whole post.
Tags:
No comments:
Post a Comment