Showing posts with label viruses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label viruses. Show all posts

Monday, November 18, 2013

Carl Zimmer - How Our Minds Went Viral

brain virus.001

Carl Zimmer's 2012 book, A Planet of Viruses, offered an intriguing and somewhat mind-boggling account of the role viruses played in our evolution (and in the evolution of the entire planet).
Viruses are the smallest living things known to science, yet they hold the entire planet in their sway. We are most familiar with the viruses that give us colds or the flu, but viruses also cause a vast range of other diseases, including one disorder that makes people sprout branch-like growths as if they were trees. Viruses have been a part of our lives for so long, in fact, that we are actually part virus: the human genome contains more DNA from viruses than our own genes. Meanwhile, scientists are discovering viruses everywhere they look: in the soil, in the ocean, even in caves miles underground.

This fascinating book explores the hidden world of viruses—a world that we all inhabit. Here Carl Zimmer, popular science writer and author of Discover magazine’s award-winning blog The Loom, presents the latest research on how viruses hold sway over our lives and our biosphere, how viruses helped give rise to the first life-forms, how viruses are producing new diseases, how we can harness viruses for our own ends, and how viruses will continue to control our fate for years to come. In this eye-opening tour of the frontiers of biology, where scientists are expanding our understanding of life as we know it, we learn that some treatments for the common cold do more harm than good; that the world’s oceans are home to an astonishing number of viruses; and that the evolution of HIV is now in overdrive, spawning more mutated strains than we care to imagine.
In a recent article for his blog at National Geographic, The Loom, Zimmer provides a capsule explanation of how the human mind "went viral."
Viruses invaded the genomes of our ancestors several times over the past 50 million years or so, and their viral signature is still visible in our DNA. In fact, we share many of the same stretches of virus DNA with apes and monkeys. Today we carry half a million of these viral fossils, which make up eight percent of the human genome. (Here are some posts I’ve written about endogenous retroviruses.) 
Our DNA has small stretches of coding called enhancers. When a specific protein connects with the enhancer for a gene, the gene's production of proteins is more rapid. Viruses have enhancers, too, that act to help the virus reproduce. However, when some viruses become fossils in our DNA and the viral enhancer becomes a permanent part of our DNA.

Scientists have identified 6 viral enhancers that have been incorporated into our DNA since our evolutionary split with chimpanzees. 
Known as PRODH, it encodes an enzyme that’s involved in making signaling molecules in the brain. And if the enzyme isn’t working properly, the brain can go awry.  
This viral enhancer no longer spurs the reproduction of its original DNA, but it does help cells in the brain make signaling molecules that are essential to brain function.
Other researchers have also found evidence for the importance of PRODH in the human brain. In some studies, mutations to the gene have been linked to schizophrenia, for example. (One study has failed to find that link, though.) A mutation that deletes the PRODH gene and its surrounding DNA has been linked to a rare psychiatric disorder, called DiGeorge syndrome. 

Here is the whole post.

How Our Minds Went Viral

by Carl Zimmer

The Loom | November 13, 2013

Did viruses help make us human? As weird as it sounds, the question is actually a reasonable one to ask. And now scientists have offered some evidence that the answer may be yes.

If you’re sick right now with the flu or a cold, the viruses infecting you are just passing through. They invade your cells and make new copies of themselves, which burst forth and infect other cells. Eventually your immune system will wipe them out, but there’s a fair chance some of them may escape and infect someone else.

But sometimes viruses can merge into our genomes. Some viruses, for example, hijack our cells by inserting its genes into our own DNA. If they happen to slip into the genome of an egg, they can potentially get a new lease on life. If the egg is fertilized and grows into an embryo, the new cells will also contain the virus’s DNA. And when that embryo becomes an adult, the virus has a chance to move into the next generation.

These so-called endogenous retroviruses are sometimes quite dangerous. Koalas, for example, are suffering from a devastating epidemic of them. The viruses are spreading both on their own from koala to koala and from parents to offspring. As the viruses invade new koala cells, they sometimes wreak havoc on their host’s DNA. If a virus inserts itself in the wrong place in a koala cell, it may disrupt its host’s genes. The infected cell may start to grow madly, and give rise to cancer.

If the koalas manage to survive this outbreak, chances are that the virus will become harmless. Their immune systems will stop their spread from one host to another, leaving only the viruses in their own genomes. Over the generations, mutations will erode their DNA. They will lose the ability to break out of their host cell. They will still make copies of their genes, but those copies will only get reinserted back into their host’s genome. But eventually they will lose even this feeble ability to replicate.

We know this is the likely future of the koala retroviruses, because we can see it in ourselves. Viruses invaded the genomes of our ancestors several times over the past 50 million years or so, and their viral signature is still visible in our DNA. In fact, we share many of the same stretches of virus DNA with apes and monkeys. Today we carry half a million of these viral fossils, which make up eight percent of the human genome. (Here are some posts I’ve written about endogenous retroviruses.)

Most of this viral DNA is just baggage that we hand down to the next generation. But sometimes mutations can transform viral DNA into something useful. Tens of millions of years ago, for example, our ancestors started using a virus protein to build the placenta.

But proteins aren’t the only potentially useful parts that we can harvest from our viruses.

Many human genes are accompanied by tiny stretches of DNA called enhancers. When certain proteins latch onto the enhancer for a gene, they start speeding up the productions of proteins from it. Viruses that infect us have enhancers, too. But instead of causing our cells to make more of our own proteins, these virus enhancers cause our cells to make more viruses.

But what happens when a virus’s enhancer becomes a permanent part of the human genome? Recently a team of scientists carried out a study to find out. They scanned the human genome for enhancers from the youngest endogenous retroviruses in our DNA. These viruses, called human-specific endogenous retroviruses, infected our ancestors at some point after they split off from chimpanzees some seven million years ago. We know this because these viruses are in the DNA of all living people, but missing from other primates.

Once the scientists had cataloged these virus enhancers, they wondered if any of them were now enhancing human genes, instead of the genes of viruses. If that were the case, these harnessed enhancers would need to be close to a human gene. The scientists found six such enhancers.

Of these six enhancers, however, only one showed signs of actually boosting the production of the nearby gene. Known as PRODH, it encodes an enzyme that’s involved in making signaling molecules in the brain. And if the enzyme isn’t working properly, the brain can go awry.

In 1999, scientists shut down the PRODH gene in mice and found a striking change in their behavior. They ran an experiment in which they played a loud noise to the mice at random times. Then they started playing a soft tone just before the noise. Normal mice learn to connect the two sounds, and they become less startled by the loud noise. But mice without PRODH remained as startled as ever.

Other researchers have also found evidence for the importance of PRODH in the human brain. In some studies, mutations to the gene have been linked to schizophrenia, for example. (One study has failed to find that link, though.) A mutation that deletes the PRODH gene and its surrounding DNA has been linked to a rare psychiatric disorder, called DiGeorge syndrome.

Once the scientists had found the virus enhancer near PRODH, they took a closer look at how they work in human cells. As they report in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences this week, they searched for the activity of PRODH in tissue from human autopsies. PRODH is most active in the brain–and most active in a few brain regions in particular, such as the hippocampus, which organizes our memories.

The new research suggests that the virus enhancer is partly responsible for PRODH becoming active where it does. Most virus enhancers in our genome are muzzled with molecular caps on our DNA. That’s probably a defense to keep our cells from making proteins willy-nilly. But the hippocampus and other regions of the brain where PRODH levels are highest, the enhancer is uncapped. It may be left free to boost the PRODH gene in just a few places in the brain.

The scientists also found one protein that latches onto the virus enhancer, driving the production of PRODH proteins. And in a striking coincidence, that protein, called SOX2, is also produced at high levels in the hippocampus.

What makes all this research all the more provocative is that this situation appears to be unique to our own species. Chimpanzees have the PRODH gene, but they lack the virus enhancer. They produce PRODH at low levels in the brain, without the intense production in the hippocampus.

Based on this research, the scientists propose a scenario. Our ancestors millions of years ago were infected with a virus. Eventually it became lodged in our genome. At some point, a mutation moved the virus enhancer next to the PRODH gene. Further mutations allowed it to helped boost the gene’s activity in certain areas of the brain, such as the hippocampus.

The scientists can’t say how this change altered the human brain, but given what we know about brain disorders linked to the PRODH gene, it could have been important.

It’s always important approach studies on our inner viruses with some skepticism. Making a compelling case that a short stretch of DNA has an important function takes not just one experiment, but a whole series of them. And even if this enhancer does prove to have been one important step in the evolution of the human brain, our brains are also the result of many other mutations of a far more conventional sort.

Still, the intriguing possibility remains. Perhaps our minds are partly the way they are today thanks to an infection our ancestors got a few millions of years ago.

[For more on the mighty influence of these tiny life forms, see my book A Planet of Viruses.]

Thursday, September 19, 2013

Curcumin Prevents Replication of Respiratory Virus; Caffeine Increases Anaerobic Performance in Cycling


Two new studies from PLoS ONE today, each one focusing on favorite substances of mine - curcumin and caffeine.

In the first one, researchers found curcumin (the yellow stuff in turmeric) to be as effective as pharmaceuticals in stopping the replication of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a major cause of bronchitis, asthma, and severe lower respiratory tract disease in infants and young children. Not only that, it also inhibits the epithelial responses to RSV, including the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Another use for one of my favorite spices.

In the other study, researchers gave caffeine (CAF) to recreationally trained male cyclists (5 mg.kg−1 body mass) and had them ride a 4000 m time trial. Turns out the caffeine increased mean power output and reduced the total time. Interestingly, in the CAF group, the anaerobic contribution during the 2200-, 2400-, and 2600-m intervals was significantly greater. However, the mean anaerobic and aerobic contributions were similar between conditions. There were also no significant differences between CAF and placebo for anaerobic work, aerobic work, or total work. Moreover, there was no difference for integrated electromyography, blood lactate concentration, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion between the conditions. So it seems for cyclists, the performance increase from caffeine manifests in the middle of a 4000 m time trial.

Here are the titles, abstracts, citations, and such.

Curcumin Prevents Replication of Respiratory Syncytial Virus and the Epithelial Responses to It in Human Nasal Epithelial Cells
Kazufumi Obata, Takashi Kojima, Tomoyuki Masaki, Tamaki Okabayashi, Shinichi Yokota, Satoshi Hirakawa, Kazuaki Nomura, Akira Takasawa, Masaki Murata, Satoshi Tanaka, Jun Fuchimoto, Nobuhiro Fujii, Hiroyuki Tsutsumi, Tetsuo Himi, Norimasa Sawada 

Abstract


The human nasal epithelium is the first line of defense during respiratory virus infection. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major cause of bronchitis, asthma and severe lower respiratory tract disease in infants and young children. We previously reported in human nasal epithelial cells (HNECs), the replication and budding of RSV and the epithelial responses, including release of proinflammatory cytokines and enhancement of the tight junctions, are in part regulated via an NF-κB pathway. In this study, we investigated the effects of the NF-κB in HNECs infected with RSV. Curcumin prevented the replication and budding of RSV and the epithelial responses to it without cytotoxicity. Furthermore, the upregulation of the epithelial barrier function caused by infection with RSV was enhanced by curcumin. Curcumin also has wide pharmacokinetic effects as an inhibitor of NF-κB, eIF-2α dephosphorylation, proteasome and COX2. RSV-infected HNECs were treated with the eIF-2α dephosphorylation blocker salubrinal and the proteasome inhibitor MG132, and inhibitors of COX1 and COX2. Treatment with salubrinal, MG132 and COX2 inhibitor, like curcumin, prevented the replication of RSV and the epithelial responses, and treatment with salubrinal and MG132 enhanced the upregulation of tight junction molecules induced by infection with RSV. These results suggest that curcumin can prevent the replication of RSV and the epithelial responses to it without cytotoxicity and may act as therapy for severe lower respiratory tract disease in infants and young children caused by RSV infection.
Full Citation: 
Obata K, Kojima T, Masaki T, Okabayashi T, Yokota S, et al. (2013, Sep 18). Curcumin Prevents Replication of Respiratory Syncytial Virus and the Epithelial Responses to It in Human Nasal Epithelial Cells. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e70225. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070225

* * * * *

Caffeine Alters Anaerobic Distribution and Pacing during a 4000-m Cycling Time Trial
 
Ralmony de Alcantara Santos, Maria Augusta Peduti Dal Molin Kiss, Marcos David Silva-Cavalcante, Carlos Rafaell Correia-Oliveira, Romulo Bertuzzi, David John Bishop, Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva

Abstract


The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of caffeine ingestion on pacing strategy and energy expenditure during a 4000-m cycling time-trial (TT). Eight recreationally-trained male cyclists volunteered and performed a maximal incremental test and a familiarization test on their first and second visits, respectively. On the third and fourth visits, the participants performed a 4000-m cycling TT after ingesting capsules containing either caffeine (5 mg.kg−1 of body weight, CAF) or cellulose (PLA). The tests were applied in a double-blind, randomized, repeated-measures, cross-over design. When compared to PLA, CAF ingestion increased mean power output [219.1±18.6 vs. 232.8±21.4 W; effect size (ES) = 0.60 (95% CI = 0.05 to 1.16), p = 0.034] and reduced the total time [419±13 vs. 409±12 s; ES = −0.71 (95% CI = −0.09 to −1.13), p = 0.026]. Furthermore, anaerobic contribution during the 2200-, 2400-, and 2600-m intervals was significantly greater in CAF than in PLA (p<0.05). However, the mean anaerobic [64.9±20.1 vs. 57.3±17.5 W] and aerobic [167.9±4.3 vs. 161.8±11.2 W] contributions were similar between conditions (p>0.05). Similarly, there were no significant differences between CAF and PLA for anaerobic work (26363±7361 vs. 23888±6795 J), aerobic work (68709±2118 vs. 67739±3912 J), or total work (95245±8593 vs. 91789±7709 J), respectively. There was no difference for integrated electromyography, blood lactate concentration, heart rate, and ratings of perceived exertion between the conditions. These results suggest that caffeine increases the anaerobic contribution in the middle of the time trial, resulting in enhanced overall performance.
Full Citation: 
Santos RdA, Kiss MAPDM, Silva-Cavalcante MD, Correia-Oliveira CR, Bertuzzi R, et al. (2013, Sep 18). Caffeine Alters Anaerobic Distribution and Pacing during a 4000-m Cycling Time Trial. PLoS ONE, 8(9): e75399. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075399

Thursday, November 08, 2012

The Secret Micro Universe: The Cell


Awesome . . . or maybe I am just a science geek. This is "the life story of a single epithelial lung cell on the front line of the longest war in history, waged across the most alien universe imaginable: our battle against viral infection."


The Secret Micro Universe: The Cell


There is a battle playing out inside your body right now. It started billions of years ago and it is still being fought in every one of us every minute of every day. It is the story of a viral infection – the battle for the cell.

This film reveals the exquisite machinery of the human cell system from within the inner world of the cell itself – from the frenetic membrane surface that acts as a security system for everything passing in and out of the cell, the dynamic highways that transport cargo across the cell and the remarkable turbines that power the whole cellular world to the amazing nucleus housing DNA and the construction of thousands of different proteins all with unique tasks. The virus intends to commandeer this system to one selfish end: to make more viruses. And they will stop at nothing to achieve their goal.

Exploring the very latest ideas about the evolution of life on earth and the bio-chemical processes at the heart of every one of us, and revealing a world smaller than it is possible to comprehend, in a story large enough to fill the biggest imaginations. With contributions from Professor Bonnie L Bassler of Princeton University, Dr Nick Lane and Professor Steve Jones of University College London and Cambridge University’s Susanna Bidgood.

Narrated by David Tennant, this is the story of a battle that has been raging for billions of years and is being fought inside every one of us right now. Swept up in a timeless drama – the fight between man and virus – viewers will see an exciting frontier of biology come alive and be introduced to the complex biochemical processes at the heart of all of us.

The programme features contributions from Professor Bonnie L Bassler of Princeton University, Dr Nick Lane and Professor Steve Jones of UCL, and Cambridge University’s Susanna Bidgood. It is the life story of a single epithelial lung cell on the front line of the longest war in history, waged across the most alien universe imaginable: our battle against viral infection.

David McNab, creative director of Wide-Eyed Entertainment Ltd, commented: “This programme would never have been possible without the guidance, enthusiasm and financial support of the Wellcome Trust. It is the kind of cutting-edge, complex science that needs ambitious visuals to make it accessible to a general audience.

“It has been a privilege to bring to life the work of so many brilliant and dedicated scientists and to reveal a scientific frontier that is both important and genuinely awe-inspiring. I sincerely hope it becomes an inspiration to a new generation of scientists and film-makers.”

Clare Matterson, director of Medical Humanities and Engagement at the Wellcome Trust, says: “‘Secret Universe’ will reveal a world that few people will have seen before, presenting scientifically accurate molecular biology in a gripping visual manner – perfect Sunday night viewing. It is a wonderful example of science programming at its best.”

Wellcome Trust broadcast grants offer support for projects and programmes that engage an audience with issues in biomedical science in an innovative, entertaining and accessible way. Previous programmes funded through the scheme include ‘The Great Sperm Race’ and ‘Inside Nature’s Giants’.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Carl Zimmer: Our Viral Future - A Planet of Viruses


This is a clip of science writer Carl Zimmer's recent talk at The 2012 Singularity Summit about the roles viruses will play in the future of humanity. Deadly new epidemics, or virus built solar cells? Or both? Zimmer's book on this topic is A Planet of Viruses.

 
Author Carl Zimmer: Our Viral Future from Singularity Institute on FORA.tv

Since we are on the topic, back in June of 2012, Zimmer wrote that 8 percent of the human genome seems to derive from endogenous retroviruses (an article excerpted from his book A Planet of Viruses, mentioned above). Other research I have seen would make this a low number.

As Razib Kahn points out in Discover:
Additionally, this isn’t just limited to viruses. See: Horizontal gene transfer between bacteria and animals.

I think on of the chasms between geneticists and the public is that a lot of things that seem creepy and strange to the public are part & parcel of the geneticist’s professional toolkit. For example, to my knowledge no transgenic mice have turned into the Brain. I have friends that order weird mouse varieties, and then do weirder things to them, every week.