Showing posts with label Spirit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spirit. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 09, 2013

Transitioning to Integrative Medicine


From Emory University, this is a useful talk on how we can move toward an integrative medicine model.



Transitioning to Integrative Medicine
Published on Apr 3, 2013

Dr. Yoon Hang John Kim talks about integrative medicine, a healing-oriented approach that takes account of the whole person (body, emotion, and spirit) including all aspects of lifestyle (March 26, 2013). Integrative medicine emphasizes the healing relationship and makes use of all appropriate therapies, both conventional and alternative, including:
  • Conventional Medicine
  • Homeopathy
  • Acupuncture & Chinese Herbs
  • Energy Healing
  • Nutrition - Food As Medicine, Anti-inflammatory Foods, Low Glycemic Foods, and Hypoallergenic Food Choices
  • Naturopathy
  • Mind-Body Medicine
His talk was sponsored by the Center for the Study of Human Health (CSHH), which was established to centralize and organize Emory's rich resource base of opportunities in health-related studies. The Center provides a home for unique interdisciplinary undergraduate curricula, as well as a functional unit where an interdisciplinary faculty-based consortium can develop path-breaking programs and research.

Friday, December 07, 2012

Shrink Rap Radio #325 – Reflections on The Animus Mundi with Jungian Analyst Monika Wikman PhD

This podcast from Dr, David Van Nuys features Monica Wikman, Ph.D., a Jungian Analyst and author of Pregnant Darkness: Alchemy and the Rebirth of Consciousness. Nice discussion.

Shrink Rap Radio #325 – Reflections on The Animus Mundi with Jungian Analyst Monika Wikman PhD



Monica Wikman, Ph.D. is a Jungian Analyst and author of Pregnant Darkness: Alchemy and the Rebirth of Consciousness (2005) and various articles in Jungian psychology journals. Monika obtained her BA from UC San Diego and her doctorate from the California School of Professional Psychology in San Diego, where her research took her deep into the study of dreams of people with terminal cancer. After teaching graduate students at California State University, Los Angeles, she graduated as a diplomat from the Jung-Von Franz Center for Depth Psychology in Zurich. She lectures internationally on mythology and symbolism, dreams and wellness, alchemy and creativity. In private practice as a Jungian Analyst and astrologer, she lives along a creek and under starry skies in Tesuque, New Mexico with horses, dogs, and friends. 
Check out the following Psychology CE Courses based on listening to Shrink Rap Radio interviews:
A psychology podcast by David Van Nuys, Ph.D.
copyright 2012: David Van Nuys, Ph.D.




Saturday, June 27, 2009

Kurt Barstow - The extended you: body, mind, and spirit

Cool new article from Kurt at the LA Examiner. See more of his articles here.

The extended you: body, mind, and spirit


Integral States and Bodies Diagram

Just as psychological wholeness is about realizing a Self greater than the one delimited by the defensive and ambitious ego, we might say that somatic wholeness (which should perhaps be seen as a vital component of psychological wholeness) is about realizing that the body is really a much more extensive thing than just the physical unit that has skin as its boundary and weight as its measure. As extraordinary as that physical unit is, with its five trillion cells, all of which have independent intelligence, and its complexly interacting and interdependent systems, the physical does not just operate on its own, separate from the other characteristics that make us human. Rather an extended sense of the body is really about the intricate connections among body (matter), mind, and spirit. What follows are the outlines of body maps from various cultures and traditions that represent this expanded body as well as its energetic systems.

We might begin with a contemporary scheme that simplifies the extended body into those aspects that correspond to our major states of consciousness--Integral Institute’s 3-bodies. Here the three bodies are gross (or physical), subtle, and causal and correspond to the states of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. While awake we are most aware of ourselves as flesh and blood, the physical body. While sleeping our body operates under different laws. It can fly and skip around through time and space, for example. And in deep sleep we return to our primordial nature, plugging into the source, at one with all that is.


The Five Koshas

Vedanta (Hindu philosophy) goes further than this, discussing five sheaths (or koshas) of the body. Annamaya kosha is the physical body. Anna means food. Pranamaya kosha is the energy body. Prana means life force or vital force, it is related to breath and that which animates the body. Manamaya kosha is the mental body, or mind. Vijnanamaya kosha is the wisdom body. This sheath is underneath the thinking, processing mind and discriminates between things. Finally, Anandamaya kosha is the bliss body. This is the peace, joy and love that exist beyond the mind. To go beyond these is to find atman, the never born, never dying center of consciousness that is the goal of meditation.


Ten Bodies of Kundalini

In Kundalini Yoga there are ten separate, interrelated bodies. all of which--except for the physical body--are made of light energy. The first body is known as the Soul, the infinite life living within. The second body is the Mental Negative, or negative mind, which protects you by revealing danger, aversion, or loss. The third body is the Mental Positive, or positive mind, which aids you by telling you what is to be gained in a situation or what you are drawn toward. The fourth body is the Mental Neutral, or neutral mind, which listens to the above two, weighs the merits of each, and then lets you know which way to act. The fifth body is the Physical Body. The sixth body is the Arc Line, which extends from earlobe to earlobe and pertains to focus, meditation, and manifestation. The seventh body is the Aura, a protective sphere of electromagnetic energy that can extend up to nine feet from the physical body. The eighth body is the Pranic, which is in charge of the breath and takes in prana or chi, the universe’s vital energy. The ninth body is the Subtle. This carries the soul when it leaves the physical body. The tenth body is the Radiant, which is a radiant sphere of light that can heal others. Finally, there is the Command Center, the place from which one controls the ten bodies.


The Seven Chakras

In the Indian system there are seven energy vortices that ascend along the craniosacral system up the spine, from the sacrum to the crown of the head. The first chakra is located at the rectum and is concerned with security and survival. The second chakra is located at the sex organs and pertains to sex, money, and creativity. The third chakra is at the navel point and is related to our identity in the world, our ego or self-image. The fourth chakra is located in the center of the chest, our “heart center.” This chakra is involved with our capacity for kindness and compassion. The fifth chakra is located at the throat and controls communication, the ability to speak your truth. The sixth chakra, or third-eye point, is positioned at the center of the forehead. From this point we gain our sense of intuition and connect to infinite wisdom. Finally, the seventh chakra, or crown chakra, is located at the top of the head. This is the chakra of Enlightenment, or where one has a sense of union with the universe. Although either varying in number or called something different, the Tibetan and Chinese systems of subtle energy also include chakras. And besides the major seven chakras that run along the spine, the Indian system contains minor chakras and also numerous nadis, or energy pathways, that run throughout the body. Along these energy pathways, which may be compared to the meridians of Traditional Chinese Medicine, are marmi points, which may be compared to the acupuncture points of TCM.


Acupuncture Man, showing the Liver Meridian

The basic elements of the Taoist energetic system are first, yin and yang, the two elemental opposite forces that make up all of creation, and second, chi or qi (life force, energy, or prana). The major energetic channels that run throughout the body in Traditional Chinese Medicine revolve around six yin organs (lungs, spleen, heart, kidney, pericardium, and liver) and six yang organs (large intestine, stomach, small intestine, bladder, triple heater--this is unique to the Chinese system--and gall bladder). Chi itself is discriminated into various kinds of chi in TCM. There is, for example, Yuan Qi, also known as prenatal qi because we inherit it from our parents. After that there is the qi we receive from our environment, through the air (Kong Qi) and through food (Gu Qi). Together these create Zong Qi, which along with Yuan Qi (prenatal), makes up Zheng Qi, or normal qi. It is this which flows through the various internal organs and their energetic pathways, although there it functions according to the jobs of each organ and becomes Liver Qi or Heart Qi or Stomach Qi, for example. And treatment in TCM is based partly on whether the qi is deficient, sinking, stagnant, or rebellious. The various acupuncture points along the meridians, when stimulated by themselves or in tandem, have the ability to relieve various symptoms. This hardly does the whole extensive system justice, but is meant rather to give an idea of just how intricately mapped out can be the energetic component of the body.


The Dan Tiens

The Dan Tien is the area about two finger’s width below the navel, which is considered the center of vital energy in the Taoist system and is the body’s center of gravity. (It is the area that expands when we take full belly breaths). This area corresponds to the Third Chakra. Although this navel area is the most famous Dan Tien, it is actually the Lower Dan Tien, for there are two more: the Middle Dan Tien, which is at the heart center or Fourth Chakra, and the Upper Dan Tien, which is at the Third-Eye Point or Sixth Chakra. These are energetic areas that are emphasized, for example, along with the crown of the head (the Du 20 acupuncture point), in Qi Gong. The cross-cultural similarities between the Taoist and Yogic centers should not really come as a surprise since, particularly the Indian, Chinese, and Tibetan cultures have been investigating the body’s energy systems and experimenting in clinical practice for thousands of years. There is, we might say, a certain reality to the body’s subtle energy centers that is confirmed among various cultures.


The Sefirot as the Body's Energy Centers

Lest we think of this phenomenon as confined to Asia, we might take a look at the ten energetic areas of the body in the Kabbalistic system. The ten sefirot (channels of divine energy) represent the stages of creation in which God generated all the created realms. In terms of the body, four sefirot are deployed along the central axis from crown of head to feet and six are deployed along the sides. The order of progression is from top to bottom, infinite to finite, when considered from the point of view of Creation. At top is the sefirah of Keter (Crown), which corresponds to the superconscious. To the left of this is Binah (Understanding) and to the right Chochmah (Wisdom). This first triplet is concerned with the mind. Below Keter, at the heart level, is Tiferet (Beauty) with Gevurah (Might) to the left and Chesed (Loving-Kindness) to the right. This triplet represents the inner emotive powers of the heart. Below this is Yesod (Foundation) with Hod (Acknowledgment) to the left and Netzach (Victory) to the right. This triplet is about emotions that turn into actions or behavior. Finally, at bottom, near the feet, is Malchut (Kingdom), which involves the power to express one’s thoughts or emotions to others. There are very close affinities to the Chakra system, especially in the three triplets, which move from the more physical at bottom to emotional at center to mental at top.


Sufi Energy Centers

Sufis also point to energy centers in the body, which are important elements within the meditative tradition. Although different traditions count slightly different numbers, these centers are known as lata’if, which means subtle layers. Each vibrates at a specific frequency the maintenance of which is important to bodily health, just as with the chakras. Particularly important in the Sufi tradition are the several energy centers around the heart. In one tradition, in fact, the energy center that resides in the heart is referred to as the “Source of Life.” The diagram at right shows the energy centers according to the MTO Shahmaghsoudi® school of Islamic Sufism. Here, besides in the heart, they are located at the coccyx, the solar plexus, the three nodes of the heart, the thymus, the throat center, the third ventricle of the brain, the brain stem, the third eye, the fontanel, and the grey layer of the brain. The force that energizes all these points is love, the power which holds the universe together. Meditating on these points generates energy and attracts energy that vibrates in the same frequency from the universal field of cosmic energy, uniting the human body with the larger order. Again, many of the lata’if may be related to the chakra and Kabbalistic systems.


The Three Buddha Bodies

Turning back, as we started, to the basic differentiated aspects of body and consciousness, we might also remind ourselves that the Buddha was considered to have three bodies or kayas: Dharmakaya, Sambhogakaya, and Nirmanakaya. The explanations and descriptions of these bodies, especially in Tibetan Buddhism, can be quite involved. But, in a nutshell, Dharmakaya or Dharma Body is the body of absolute truth, the Buddha at the center of the universe, the unmanifest, formless, and eternal, ever-available body. Sambhogakaya is something like the Bliss Body or Body of Perfect Enjoyment. It represents the Buddha as a transcendent, celestial being, and is also eternal, although it has form. Finally, Nirmanakaya is the Manifestation Body, or the body of the historical Buddha. These three bodies are not separate but interrelated, existing together as three aspects of the same thing, much as do the gross, subtle, and causal bodies outlined by the Integral scheme above, which is obviously derived from a synthesis of various cultural traditions.


The Trinity (El Greco)

It is interesting in this vein to look at the Christian mystery of the Trinity, which describes God in three aspects that are different but cannot be separated in the understanding of God. Here we have God the Father, the unmanifest absolute ground of being, The Son, God’s incarnation in the flesh, the historical Jesus, and the Holy Ghost, which corresponds to a more subtle, non-physical form. It is difficult not to think of the triad Body-Mind-Spirit or gross-subtle-causal. In as much as these schemes of the extended body attempt to account in a complete way for all the major aspects of reality that we experience, it makes sense that a paradoxical scheme for describing God, or the mystery of absolute reality, would be related to these three basic categories of body.

One of the exciting things about living in this era is that we suddenly have available to us the totality of the world’s cultures’ insights into the nature of reality, which can be compared and mapped out together. One important component of that synthetic work is the cumulative view of the human body as something that deeply reflects an integral reality in which we are more than just a physical machine run by a mind and, in fact, comprise within ourselves the order of the Kosmos.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Roger Walsh - 10-Minute Practices to Reconnect with Spirit

Integral Life has made some articles freely available to everyone -- here are three ten-minute meditations from Roger Walsh to help you reconnect with Spirit.

10-Minute Practices to Reconnect with Spirit

Roger Walsh, the author of Essential Spirituality, was a guest teacher at Integral Institute's Integral Leadership seminars, where he presented the seven essential practices of the world's great Wisdom Traditions. We are proud to present a selection of the experiential exercises led by Roger at those seminars. Each clip is 10-15 minutes long, and is a quick and easy way to recontact the sacred dimensions of this and every moment. Just sit back, relax, and let the next eight minutes be devoted to your higher Self....

10 Minutes to an Eternal Perspective


10 Minutes to Recontact Sacred Breath


8 Minutes to Equanimity




Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Body and Soul: On the Condition of Being Human

This is a cool article that Grey Drane posted in the Integral Room at FriendFeed.

Body and soul: on the condition of being human

by Kurt Barstow


Alex Grey, Wonder
What makes us most human? This was a recent question posted on the website Gaia Community (http//www.gaia.com/). There are so many ways to answer that question. Our character flaws and tender vulnerabilities are the first things that come to mind. Without these we are certainly not human and this is the reason we can have such empathy for others. The second thing that comes to mind is our self-consciousness, the fact that we are embodied beings who can sense our original nature as spirit and who therefore have this upward, expansive sense of self, which is another reason, recognizing this in all others, we can care for each other so deeply. The great fifteenth-century humanist and teacher Guarino of Verona was thinking precisely of this dual nature when he said in his speech welcoming Giovanni Tavelli as the new bishop of Ferrara:

"In these matters, there is nobody who does not know that man consists of such elements that the creator of things, source of a better world, when he placed holy and heavenly man in the world as an animal, made him erect while he made all the other animals inclined toward the earth; to man he gave a sublime face, and fashioned him to see the heavens and raise his uplifted face to the stars.

For because there was no expectation of immortality remaining in those animals, he designed them to be stretched out on the earth and slaves to their stomachs and to food. But man he made erect and tall, so that when all "fallen things" have been trampled, he would take up the virtue to which he was born, he would know his origin and contemplate God himself; and since the other animals are animals of man, man would understand that he is the animal of God."

Perhaps what makes us most human is to be located in soul, for by its very nature it seems to bridge these two worlds of the corruptible and the incorruptible, the mortal and immortal, the earthly and the heavenly. This tension even seems to come out in the two primary models of soul that seem to be active in psychology today. On one hand, there is the neo-Jungian, Imaginal soul as articulated especially by James Hillman and Thomas Moore. This is a kind of downward force (Hillman calls the process of the soul descending into embodied form and living its life “growing down”) that is behind our biographies, our fate, our uniqueness. And in this version of soul we have to sometimes honor rather than cure or wash away our symptoms, our perceived weaknesses or flaws, in order for soul-making to occur. We sometimes need to embrace and work through the messiness of our lives rather than to sanitize it or narrow it down to some standardized norm. As Moore says, "Care of the soul means respecting its emotions and fantasies, however objectionable," and, "We do not care for the soul by shrinking it down to reasonable size." In this version of soul it is our idiosyncrasies that need to be tended to by the faculty of our imagination, the soul’s greatest means of communication.

On the other hand, there is the evolutionary soul of Sri Aurobindo, the great twentieth-century Indian sage, that is set forth in Brant Cortright's book on Integral Psychology. (And one might say that this is also probably pretty much the way in which Ken Wilber thinks of soul along integral developmental lines, although soul seems to me to be less clearly in focus than spirit in his work.) This soul is immortal and passes from body to body during successive lifetimes. In Aurobindo it is the secret heart (the hrdaye guhayam), the psychic center located behind the heart. It's importance is developmental and it acquires new powers and capacities in each lifetime as it matures. As Cortright says, "The psychic center is spirit in manifestation, ever alive, ever whole, ever pure, yet also progressing as it evolves new abilities out of itself." The cultivation of this soul leads to authenticity, to greater depth of living, but the direction it takes is clear; it is part of the movement upward toward Spirit. As Cortright further says, "The psychic center moves always toward harmony, truth, beauty, goodness, and tenderness. Its intrinsic nature is spiritual, and to these higher spiritual values it is irresistibly attracted. But at first its voice is overshadowed by the clamor of body, heart, and mind." Rather than the quirky, imaginative, highly individualistic soul outlined in Moore and Hillman, this version of soul-making is about purification and its movement is toward a series of values that define a norm.

These two views of soul would at first seem irreconcilable. One explanation might be that the neo-Jungian soul as I have characterized it is not really soul but something soul-like that operates at the level of heart and mind rather than a stop on the way toward Spirit. It may also be, however, that a developmental model of souI is too sanitized and normative because it only looks at movement in one direction--soul as a goal--and doesn’t account for the development of soul in the vagaries of an embodied being’s life. I think, however, that it is notable that these two visions of soul together seem to comprise the poles of precisely what makes us human--the mutable and immutable. Taken together they seem to provide a more complete picture of soul than either do separately. Perhaps this is simply a matter of immanence and transcendence. In the first version of soul what is being described is primarily soul in its downward manifestation, taking care of earthly, perhaps unfinished business. In the second version of soul, soul is a vehicle in the evolution of consciousness, the ultimate journey of each soul, which is the same and involves purification on some level, as it ascends toward Spirit. In any event, I think we can say that it is this thing, which is also a kind of faculty or capacity at the same time it is an essence, that makes us human. It’s natural home is between the body and mind, on one hand, and Spirit, on the other hand.


Thursday, October 09, 2008

Robert Masters - The Non-Nonduality of Nondual Teachings


Adastra posted this in the Robert Masters pod at Gaiam -- a great essay by Robert. He has a way of cutting through the BS and getting to meat of things, which makes him one of our most important integral thinkers and teachers.

From Robert Augustus Masters' blog (May 3, 2007)

THE NON-NONDUALITY OF NONDUAL TEACHINGS

Before launching into this blog — which is still veined here and there with the rant that it once was — I’ll toss in something about the nondual, risking that my doing so will muddy rather than clarify my topic, given the severe limitations of language in trying to describe what transcends description.

ABOUT THE NONDUAL

To nondual being, the inherent inseparability of all that exists is neither a concept nor an experience, but rather an obviousness beyond understanding, consistently recognized to not only always already exist, but also to be none other than the consciousness that “knows” it. (This may be paradoxical to the mind, especially the rational mind, but is not to the heart.)

That is, not only is awareness naturally aware of itself here, but it also is obviously not apart from whatever may be arising, be such manifestation gross or subtle, ephemeral or long-lasting, peaceful or fearful.

No dissociation from phenomena, no strategic withdrawal from life, nowhere to go, no one to be, while “showing up” as all form, forever and everywhere and everywhen — such phrases, blooming with mind-transcending paradox (and the debris of exploded rationality), point to the unimaginable yet ever-present reality of the nondual, and point with unavoidable inaccuracy, given that there is not a fitting language for the nondual (because of the inevitably dialectical nature of language, not to mention the need for an ear that can “hear” and appreciate nondual statements).

The reality of non-separation is never not here, never not available, ever “inviting” us to awaken from the entrapping dreams we habitually fuel and occupy. We may conceive of it as a place, a stage, an achievement, a reward — but it is simply what we forever already are, already transcending (and simultaneously including) every would-be “us” that would attempt to assume the position of self.

The personality is no longer the locus of self, but it still persists — and why shouldn’t it? If one is at home “in” (and as) the nondual, then personality, like everything else, is but one more non-binding expression of nondual being, asking not for annihilation, but for recognition and acceptance. To the realizer of the nondual, everything, everything, is God — anger, joy, duality, personality, clouds, wonder, fear. There is only God, only the Self, only the Real, only the One, only the hyperbole-transcending reality of what we truly are. So what problem is there, really, if fear or any other undesirable state arises? From a nondual perspective, such arising is, to put it mildly, radically nonproblematic.

In the nondual, fear is not what is transcended; what is transcended is what was done with fear in nondual states or stages.

Okay, so here we go…

THE NON-NONDUALITY OF NONDUAL TEACHINGS

Some of the more rigidly dualistic — and dehumanizing — approaches to spirituality can be found in nondual schools, nondual paths, nondual practices and perspectives.
Behind the nondual half-smiles perhaps ever so gently flickering across the faces of more than a few nondual teachers — or sometimes self-proclaimed non-teachers, as what they teach cannot, they often insist, really be taught — something very personal, something decidedly non-nondual, something with measurable egoic emissions, may be seeking unmuted expression, which of course cannot be openly permitted (unless perhaps it’s clearly positive or pleasant), as it might taint or screw up the proceedings (exposing, for example, the attachments or anger or less-than-noble desires of the teacher).

But wouldn’t something other than recycled, far-from-fresh nondual — and more often than not obsessively impersonal — pronouncements and unrelentingly detachment be a huge relief?

Where has the wildness, the rawness, the full-blooded yes, of spirituality gone? Must it be caged, drugged, homogenized, reduced to squeaky clean teacherliness for hungry seekers? Must we play vigilant zookeeper to its edginess? Must we dehumanize it?

The spooning out of nondual pablum — pre-chewed for us — assumes that we have no teeth, no bite, no need for uncooked truth, and just need to keep our bibs on. Spiritual etiquette. Mind your manners if you want another spoonful of the understanding. But just because it’s easy to swallow doesn’t mean that it’s easy to digest!

It’s enough to stir up some revolutionary rudeness. If being off the path can be part of the path, then why so much emphasis on being spiritually correct? Equanimity sometimes is just sedation in spiritual drag. Who’s that behind the serenity shades?
Just as much of contemporary art has become more about the intellectualization — or, better, over-intellectualization — of art than about art itself, so too have many contemporary takes on nonduality fallen into the same trap. Many of those claiming to teach or offer nondual spirituality may cover their tracks with nondual wordplay — displaying, yes, attachment to the label “nondual” — but no matter how they say it, their separation from and refusal to truly explore and get down into (and it’s only “down” to preconceived “up-ness”) the dual, the personal, the idiosyncratic, the shadowy, and, yes, the unrepentantly egoic, keeps them (and their followers) up to their eyeballs in good old dualism, clinging to the idea (or ideal) of nonduality.

Premature claims to abiding in nondual awareness run rampant in modern spiritual circles — making spiritual real estate out of a moment of light — and how could they not, given that they arise in and are embedded in a culture slavishly devoted to getting it right now? Given the inevitably contingent nature of manifest existence, what else would you expect?

When we try to make too much out of a moment of genuine awakening, what we’re mostly making is just more of the very selfhood we are so eager to transcend.
We like our heroes to be a bit above us, so we can cut them down to size after we’re done romanticizing them. Having a nondually-oriented teacher telling us that we already are what we ache to be, and that our not getting this is just part of it, etcetera after predictable etcetera, may temporarily ease us, because it quiets our mind for a bit, but in most cases it’s really not very helpful and in fact tends to distract and strand us from the work we truly need to do, including facing, working with, and integrating our shadow elements (our fear, despair, aggression, promiscuity, greed, and so on).

The shadow of most nondualism is its unacknowledged dualism, the key symptoms of which include spiritual constipation, ego-transcending egoity, and resolute aversion to acknowledging the need to do any shadow-work.

An almost-universally acknowledged sage of the nondual like Ramana Maharshi spoke and acted from a nondual perspective simply because he couldn’t do otherwise. Just as importantly, he wasn’t looking for immunity from the raw stuff of life, and he sure wasn’t busy being clever or verbally elusive.

We don’t need any more regurgitated nondual teachings. We need the original thing, the firsthand transmission, the industrial strength dosage minus the usual mixers, but only if and when we are sufficiently ripe. And how do we get ripe? By living, really living, getting right into the messy stuff of Life, including that dualistic awakener and unparalleled exposer of neuroses and personal bullshit known as intimate relationship.

Just as scientific methodology tends to select for those who find comfort in the promise of a consensually validated remove (or emotional distance) from the object of study, nondual teaching opportunities tend to select for those who find comfort in the promise of a consensually validated (or emotional distance) from the personal. But the truly nondual nonproblematically includes — and not just in theory! — the dualistic and personal, and is not a solution to it!

Nondual teachings point out the pointlessness of searching for what was never really lost, but often overlook or underemphasize the fact that the search is not experienced as pointless until it actually has been undertaken.

So we might as well jump in, getting messy, getting attached, getting hurt, getting involved — we’ve made, and are making, an appearance here as humans, so let’s get into it! Only when we’re really in it and truly involved, can we leave it, and then, and only then, can we realize with our totality that where we were and where we are is precisely the same locationless location.

Those under the thumb of nondual teachings might say that there is nothing to do, because there is no one to do it, etcetera after colorless etcetera, thereby creating a philosophical dead-end (or hermeneutic drainhole) masquerading as spiritual wisdom. However, the non-doing of the true sage is far from the non-doing of the rest of us, and needs to be recognized as such.

And thus ends this piece, with a deep bow to the true teachers and embodiers of the nondual, in whose presence and love my words stretch beyond themselves, and in whose wisdom my arrogance evaporates, leaving nothing but What-Really-Matters.

- Robert Augustus Masters

Thursday, August 14, 2008

Patrick Lee Miller - Psychoanalysis as Spirituality?


Patrick Lee Miller, at The Immanent Frame, posted this interesting article on "Psychoanalysis as Spirituality." He argues that psychoanalysis, like spirituality, allows us to know who we are, organize our lives in service of our needs and desires, and that this allows us to be more creative and compassionate in our lives.

He is essentially arguing against Charles Taylor (A Secular Age), who denies that psychoanalysis is a genuine spirituality. Taylor comes from a Christian perspective in his rejection of psychoanalysis.

Here is the crux of Miller's argument with Taylor (which is actually quite long and detailed):
The hermeneutic delves into the unavoidable, deep psychic conflicts in our make-up. But these have no moral lesson for us; the guilt or remorse points to no real wrong. We strive to understand them in order to reduce their force, to become able to live with them. On the crucial issue, what we have morally or spiritually to learn from our suffering, it is firmly on the therapeutic side: the answer is “nothing.”

This is the nut of Taylor’s criticisms of psychoanalysis as a spiritual source, but it is just an elaboration of the second of those canvassed above: even if analysis involves a conversion, a growth in wisdom, a new, higher view of the world, this wisdom will be an effect rather than a cause of the therapy. After all, he thinks, there is nothing morally or spiritually to be learned from our suffering itself. Taylor discounts psychoanalysis as a spiritual source because whatever growth of wisdom occurs in it is not among “the hinges of healing.” A spiritual source, in sum, must change someone by some new wisdom it generates in those who step into its waters.

This seems to me a very good definition of a spiritual source. Accepting it, then, we should count psychoanalysis as a spiritual source only if a growth in wisdom is among the causes of the transformations it effects.
I'm not a Christian, but I reject psychoanalysis as a true spirituality as well, for quite different reasons. And in making this argument, we'll ignore the fact that there is very little resembling traditional Freudian psychoanalysis still being practiced.

My argument against is based in the fundamental goal of psychoanalysis -- stabilizing the self. While I think this is crucial to any "true" spiritual development, it is only a beginning point, after which we will want to transcend the concerns of the relative self as we seek more expansive and less egoic experience in our practice and lives.

Wisdom (which is generally rational) also should be distinguished from spirituality (generally trans-rational), which I think Taylor gets and Miller does not. Of course, this all depends on how we define spirituality. In this case, I think we are talking about practices that offer a technology of transcendence.

Buddhism and Suffering

Taylor is arguing that psychoanalysis converts "sin" into "illness," and that sin can be transcended through submission and faith, illness cannot:
The therapeutic suffers from three related problems, he argues, all reducible to a shift from the notion of sin to the notion of illness. First of all, Christianity sees sin as a normal condition with a certain dignity, since it is the preference for an apparent, albeit illusory, good. By contrast, in illness there is no apparent good, only “pure failure, weakness, lack, diminishment.” Secondly, whereas Christian redemption is achieved by conversion, therapy’s “healing doesn’t involve conversion, a growth in wisdom, a new, higher way of seeing the world; or at least, these are not the hinges of healing, though they may be among its results.” Thirdly, whereas the Christian conversion from sin, like the original fall into it, must be freely chosen, illness and then its cure may arise without any choice at all. “The original fall,” when it is a fall into illness, “is entirely in the nature of compulsion, or modes of imprisonment.” In sum, Taylor argues that secular humanism’s effort to rehabilitate the body and everyday life ends with the therapeutic triumph denying it a dignity it once had. “What was supposed to enhance our dignity has reduced it,” he concludes; “we are just to be dealt with, manipulated into health.”
Miller attempts to refute these arguments point by point. But in the end, as quoted above, Miller contends that our suffering offers no moral or spiritual lesson for us, which, to me, confirms Taylor's rejection of it as a spirituality.

Perhaps, as a Buddhist, I am biased. In Buddhism, suffering is the foundation of the path toward enlightenment (however one wants to define that ambiguous term). Dukkha, which is often translated as "suffering," is the truth of our relative existence -- the central idea of Buddhism:

The Buddha discussed three kinds of dukkha.

  • Dukkha-dukkha (pain of pain) is the obvious sufferings of :
  1. pain
  2. illness
  3. old age
  4. death
  5. bereavement
  • Viparinama-dukkha (pain of alteration) is suffering caused by change:
  1. violated expectations
  2. the failure of happy moments to last
  • Sankhara-dukkha (pain of formation) is a subtle form of suffering arising as a reaction to qualities of conditioned things, including the
  1. skandhas
  2. the factors constituting the human mind

It denotes the experience that all formations (sankhara) are impermanent (anicca) - thus it explains the qualities which make the mind as fluctuating and impermanent entities. It is therefore also a gateway to anatta, selflessness (no-self). Insofar as it is dynamic, ever-changing, uncontrollable and not finally satisfactory, unexamined life is itself precisely dukkha.[5] The question which underlay the Buddha's quest was "in what may I place lasting relevance?" He did not deny that there are satisfactions in experience: the exercise of vipassana assumes that the meditator sees instances of happiness clearly. Pain is to be seen as pain, and pleasure as pleasure. It is denied that happiness dependent on conditions will be secure and lasting.[6]

Dukkha is also listed among the three marks of existence, and the Buddha taught with his first three Noble Truths that it exists, has discernible causes, of which there is an account, and that there is a path for release from it. The final Noble Truth is his path.[7]

Dukkha is often seen as our best teacher, the experiences in our life that can point us toward the cessation of suffering. As such, it has incredible moral and spiritual value, and is not in any way void of meaning.

Which Definition of Spirituality?

Psychoanalysis certainly can remove some of the obstacles to a more spiritual experience of our lives, but as Ken Wilber has pointed out (in Integral Psychology), the Freudian approach tends to deal with issues of development in the first two or three stages of our lives (basically up to age 8). This period of life is essentially pre-egoic, lasting up to the beginning of a more solid an rational ego structure.

If you read the Freudian and neo-Freudian literature, they are dealing most explicitly with the traumas of early childhood (attachment, early trauma, object relations, and so on), when the ego is raw and in its early formation. They are not dealing with post-existential issues at all (even the Jungian approach only works with the existential).

Spirituality can have four definitions, according to Wilber:
In Integral Psychology, I suggest that there are at least four widely used definitions of spirituality, each of which contains an important but partial truth, and all of which need to be included in any balanced account: (1) spirituality involves peak experiences or altered states, which can occur at almost any stage and any age; (2) spirituality involves the highest levels in any of the lines; (3) spirituality is a separate developmental line itself; (4) spirituality is an attitude (such as openness, trust, or love) that the self may or may not have at any stage.[20]
For the most part, I think we have been talking about spirituality as a separate developmental line, or possibly, the highest level of any and all lines. Taylor and Miller might be talking about two different things, which could be part of the disagreement (without reading Taylor's book, I cannot be sure of this, but it's my suspicion).

It's an interesting article, but I think he fails to make his case that psychoanalysis is a true spirituality. I'd be curious to hear if anyone else agrees or disagrees with Miller's arguments.


Thursday, July 24, 2008

One Peace - Share the Silence

A cool event if you happen to live in or near Detroit:
One Peace - Share the Silence

We invite you to join us.

>Thousands of people are expected to gather in Detroit metro area. Celebrate the international day of peace.

One Peace is a multi-ethnic, large scale meditation and dialogue to be held September 21, the United Nations International Day of Peace. Held at the Eastern Michigan Convocation Center in Ypsilante, the event is expected to attract up to 10,000 people from the Detroit metropolitan area and across the country. It will be hosted by an interfaith, non-partisan coalition of local, regional and nationwide organizations in collaboration with Sarvodaya USA.

Primary speakers will be Gandhi Peace Prize winner Dr. A.T. Ariyaratne, founder of the Sarvodaya Movement of Sri Lanka, and Dr. Michael Bernard Beckwith of the 8,000-member Agape International Spiritual Center in Culver City, California. Representatives from diverse religious and ethnic communities in Michigan will share the stage.

One Peace is but one of an expected minimum of 3,500 such events in 200 countries worldwide on September 21. Its purpose is to focus positive spiritual energy and commitment to the cause of peace in individuals, families, communities, countries and the world. Participants will be asked to become conscious of basic human needs that are the precursors to peace, and commit themselves to a better world. For more information: www.onepeace.us

Here is Dr. A.T. Ariyaratne speaking at Schoolcraft College, Livonia, MI (October 2007):



Founder of What Is Enlightenment? Magazine, Andrew Cohen asks the founder of Agape spiritual community Michael Beckwith and his musical director Rickie Byars Beckwith "What Is Soul?":




Friday, June 13, 2008

Snapshots of Awakening

This week's One Minute Shift from IONS features Adyashanti, who I have never heard of before, but I like what he has to say.
Spiritual teacher and author, Adyashanti, shares many inspiring thoughts on awakening. Take a journey through thought-provoking images, inspired by his words of wisdom. “Authentic Awakening,” “Ruthless Honesty” and “Dissolving Divisions” are some of the titles for the snapshots brought to you in this One Minute Shift. You may want to watch this one more than once!





Friday, May 16, 2008

The Basics of Evolutionary Spirituality


A new article at Integrative Spirituality takes a look at Evolutionary Spirituality. I'm not sure who authored this piece. It's long and makes some big assumptions, but it's interesting.

In general, I agree with the statements made below, but I sense a bit of a human-centric bias that I think is not really supported by the evidence.

Here is the beginning, which includes all of the basic premises.
The Basics of Evolutionary Spirituality ---- The Deepest Patterns, Purposes and Intentions of 14 billion Years of Evolutionary Progress and What they Mean for Your Personal Destiny and Success!

What are the Deepest Patterns, Purposes and Intentions of 14 billion Years of Evolutionary Progress?

To understand the new ideas of the evolutionary spirituality movement it is necessary to understand what are the deepest reoccurring success patterns found in evolution. In other words, what is really going o­n within the deep time natural laws and processes of the universe's 14 billion years of successful physical evolution.

Even though the following summary of those deep evolutionary "success" patterns may initially appear a bit technical or complex, it is the essential foundation to understanding the most "proven" principles, processes and spiritual implications found within the power of evolution itself as well as the Evolutionary Spirituality movement. This knowledge is the core of success in all life's endeavors...

In its deepest, most repeated and successful patterns our estimated 13.7 billion year physical evolution appears to be moving towards creating or upholding the following:

a. Expanding diversity and novelty (with a potential towards a theoretical exhaustion of all possibilities for more novelty and diversity.)

b. Expanding complexity (with a potential towards a theoretical exhaustion of
all possibilities for more complexity.)

c. Expanding adaptation/mutation/change (towards a theoretical exhaustion of all possibilities of more adaptation/mutation.) Adaptation/mutation being defined as
the potential to change/evolve/adapt/mutate to contingencies based o­n new conditions. Expanding diversity, novelty, complexity, adaptation and/or mutation from a limited field of view or perspective within the evolutionary system and can create the appearance from limited or smaller perspectives of chance, randomness, chaos or even whim.

d. Expanding energy exchanges and/or transfers (towards a theoretical exhaustion of all possibilities of more energy exchanges and/or transfers.) {Please note: Every item in bold in this section immediately below, directly or indirectly needs exchanges or transfers of energy for expanding or to become more.}

Exchanges or transfers of energy can be in the form of:

  1. increasing energy flow,

  2. decreasing or dispersal of energy flow or

  3. the creation of dynamic energy equilibriums or static energy fields. (Static energy fields are conditions where energy is in a minimal state of flow or dispersal and collects in an area as stored energy. Dynamic equilibriums can be composed of any of the relationships between individual parts, sub systems of
    the whole and/or the whole of evolution itself. These relationships are composed of, and maintained by, appropriate and balancing (needed, fair and/or just,) spiraling dynamic energy exchanges between the individual parts, the sub systems of the whole and/or the whole of evolution itself. Dynamic equilibriums allow for the continuous spiraling and expanding of the energy exchanges needed to adjust to existing and new forms of diversity, novelty, complexity, mutation and adaptation within the overall equilibrium’s individual parts, sub systems and/or the whole of evolution itself within the tolerances for the existence and sustainability of that particular dynamic equilibrium.)


    iv. the critical evolutionary juncture:
    There is a point in the creation or maintenance of dynamic equilibriums (any kind of groupings in the universe weather it be atoms, cells, molecules, solar systems, galaxies, or even marriages, families, corporations, organizations, nations etc) where if the balance of energy exchanges within the myriad of forms that energy forms can be exchanged within or between dynamic equilibriums, either fails to establish itself or goes to far out of balance. When that happens a point is reached where o­ne of two things generally happen. Those two outcomes are either evolutionary adaption and growth toward the establishment or re-establishment of either new or old dynamic equilibriums or --- breakdown, retrogression and/or extinction.

    What is most exciting about this critical evolutionary juncture is that due to the increasing intelligence, consciousness and autopoiesis (inherent creativity,) of and between the evolving individual parts, sub systems of the dynamic equilibrium and/or the whole of evolution itself the individual parts and sub systems of some existing or potentially new dynamic equilibrium can have a significant effect o­n either the establishment or reestablishment of either new or old dynamic equilibriums thus preventing evolutionary breakdown, retrogression or extinction.

e. If critical junctures are passed through successfully, the above success patterns move the individual parts and sub systems of evolution as well as the whole of evolution in a spiraling expansion toward:

  1. more dynamic equilibriums of expanding order, integration and harmony being established within individual parts and sub systems continuously re-balancing apparent chaos toward order. (Evolution at the deepest reoccurring success levels appears to proceed though cooperative win/win or lose/lose arrangements and not pure survival of fittest (win/lose) as has been popularly and grossly mischaracterized about the nature of evolution.)

  2. more self organization/autonomy/consciousness and/or freedom for more individual parts and sub systems, which is counter-balanced by the pull of more interdependency and interdependencies with even more complex larger systems seeking to establish their own dynamic equilibrium and integration of expanding order and harmony, toward...

    more sustainability: all individual parts, sub systems and the whole seeking to last for more time ---
    for more individual parts and more individual sub systems within the new larger system, moving theoretically towards the whole evolutionary system seeking an integration of all parts and sub systems into a unified sustainable dynamic equilibrium of the highest possible level of order, integration and harmony for itself.)

    An important sub-part to the spiraling process of creating more individual part and sub system self organization/autonomy/consciousness/freedom comes about through more educational experiences in which the individual parts or sub systems through some form of trial and error have the potential to experience more conflict than is comfortable or more pleasure and/or the relief of the discomfort (the inherent cause and effect rewards or punishments of their actions/choices,) or pleasure, which appears to educate/teach/evolve the individual parts or sub systems toward more adaptability by developing more intelligence/awareness and in some organisms like humankind, more self consciousness. It appears that o­ne of the greatest success deep patterns of evolution is continually creating tensional and turbulent conditions that stimulate and optimize adaptation and growth. (The philosopher Hegel proposed that the direction of life in the universe is for more and more matter to eventually become conscious.)

    What the Deep Success Patterns of our 14 billion Years of Evolutionary Progress Mean for Your Personal Destiny and Success?

    In the reoccurring deepest patterns of the 14 billion years of successful evolutionary process and progress you can see the most basic patterns and laws for success that every individual, family, organization, corporation, nation, system or thing must sooner or later acknowledge and follow--- if that dynamic equilibrium or grouping wishes to survive or thrive. Evolution “is a general condition to which all theories, all hypotheses and all systems must bow… Evolution is a light illuminating all facts, a curve that all lines must follow.” Pierre Teilhard De Chardin

    From the repetition of the deep patterns unfolds the destiny of the universe and all things in it. Any individual, grouping, organization, nation or system that acknowledges the realities of these reoccurring deep success patterns and then orders itself by their deep time truths will have an overwhelming survival advantage over individuals, groupings, organizations, nations or systems that don’t. This advantage will give them far better control over their individual and collective physical destinies.

    If you take the time at the end of this section to re-read the deep patterns again, but this time from the completely new perspective of asking yourself, how can you can apply these deep evolutionary truths to your current personal situations and the groups that you interact with, you will find real treasure. While re-reading them, take the time to notice where your life or current social groupings are resisting, denying or going directly against the flow of any of the deep patterns. Note down any new ideas that you might have about any changes you could make in your life to remedy those matter.

    The deep evolutionary patterns above relate most directly to the physical and psychological aspects of our lives and the world, but they also do relate to our spiritual lives in many new ways. For hundreds of generations before the advent of modern science, humanity has been empirically discovering some of these deep time success patterns and recording them in its sacred texts to be able teach their importance to an individual’s success and destiny.

    When you review them again with new deep time eyes you will gradually begin to see where most of our current religious commandments and social laws have come from. You also should be able to see in life-renewing ways the essential future role that your co-creative free will and your adaptive, growing consciousness (your agency) will play to interconnect, interrelate and cooperatively partner with other dynamic equilibrium groupings (your communions,) to prevent breakdown, retrogression and/or extinction. You many even embrace a new kind of “normal,” “peaceful” and healthy way of making your vital energy exchanges with the many dynamic equilibrium groupings of your life in a manner that although it looks like near continuous dynamic tension and turbulent balance, is completely appropriate to the natural evolutionary success process.

    As you continue reading the remaining sections you will also discover the spiritual wisdom o­n how the deep patterns of evolution both reflect the intentions and purposes of the universe itself, the Ever Present Origin of the Universe (it/he/she aka God/Buddha) as well as the expanded success patterns and laws of the emerging rebirth of post post-modern spirituality and religion.


    The New Spirituality implied within the Deepest Patterns of Physical Evolution and Evolutionary Progress

    In addition to how the deepest patters of evolution relate to the virtues above, there comes into view paralleling relationships between the physical patterns and trends of evolution and the evolution of Spirit and spirituality within the process of evolution. Based upon what we know about evolution and deepest patters of evolution (above):

  1. The evolutionary universe(s) can be fairly described as a single energy/matter event that inherently enfolds and/or contains the interweaving of all physical, mental and spiritual reality.

  2. The evolutionary universe(s) begin with energy that solidifies, unfolds or develops into matter.

  3. Matter eventually unfolds or develops into life.

  4. life eventually unfolds or develops into thought.

  5. Thought eventually unfolds or develops into self consciousness, And,

  6. According to classical spiritual wisdom, self consciousness eventually recognizes itself as spirit/soul, develops into spirit/soul or unfolds into spirit/soul (depending upon your particular spiritual perspective.)

  7. In its currently known final phase, the evolution of spirit/soul within the physical universe unfolds, recognizes itself as or, develops into a new consciousness of God and/or Buddha or, depending upon your particular spiritual perspective, actual additional states or presences of God and/or Buddha. These new or additional consciousnesses, states or presences God and/or Buddha that gradually unfold, self recognize or develop through the evolutionary process are not the God and/or Buddha that developed exclusively or solely out of matter and evolution. (In addition to the very infinite, absolute and transcendent God
    and/or Buddha that was fully present at and before the beginning of the evolutionary universe they are now appearing as an either partial or complete, new or additional God and/or Buddha consciousnesses, states or presences within the evolutionary universes itself.) The direction of the universe may not be just more and more matter becoming conscious as Hegel said and as the deep patterns of evolution prove, it may be more and more matter becoming God/Buddha conscious as itself. o­n o­ne level it can be said that it appears that the whole universe is turning back and looking at itself and becoming more aware of itself as an interconnected unified totality. Wow!

  8. As a creative free will act of delight, love and sharing of itself with all of creation and, to expand its own self manifestation and self realization in new ways beyond the limitations of absolute infinity and eternity, the infinite, transcendent and absolute God and/or Buddha that was fully present at and before the beginning of the evolutionary universe has creatively and intentionally involved itself into the developmental progression of the evolutionary universe. In and through the development of the evolutionary universe the infinite,
    transcendent and absolute God and/or Buddha can also experience new creative
    delight, play, adventure and satisfactions that are additive to the absolute infinity and eternity of qualities of the absolute and infinite God and/or Buddha that were fully present at and before the beginning of the evolutionary universe.

  9. The God and/or Buddha that was fully present before the beginning of the evolutionary universe is present in the evolutionary universes, but in a new and implicit (and/or multiple) form(s). Most amazingly it is by and through the evolutionary process itself that the infinite, absolute God and/or Buddha makes its divinity explicit in new and additional ways. The enfolded Divine sacredness found within the unfolding of the evolutionary process makes this great step by step new evolutionary expanding unveiling of divinity possible. This is likely the greatest of all possible spiritual adventures --- the divinization of the universe(s) through the natural evolutionary process in which we are vital partners and co-creators.

  10. The discovery of the evolutionary process by human consciousness (Darwin et
    all,) will some day be widely seen and acknowledged as o­ne of the most dramatic and important events in the spiritual advancement in human mentality because at this epic event the universe(s) folded back o­n itself through human consciousness and for the first time (and in the whole new way through science,) a creature looked nature and its Origin back and the eye and said, what exactly are you up to (as can been seen from your actual results)? This was the cross-over moment that prepared us for a whole new way to discover the enfolded, implicit, involved God and/or Buddha becoming explicit in the process of evolution within ourselves as well as within every other particle and thing
    existing within the evolutionary universe(s).

  11. Individuals (much less humankind,) awakening to the enfolded, intrinsic, involved presence of the infinite, absolute God and/or Buddha becoming fully explicit in time development or evolutionary nature was considerably more difficult than awakening to eternity or the understanding of the infinite, transcendent and absolute God and/or Buddha as an eternal presence before the universe began as it has traditionally been presented by the traditional
    religions of the world for millennia. This is again because the process of science had to first present human consciousness with an understanding of the evolutionary process itself before the enfolded involved and evolving identity, meanings and purposes of God and/or Buddha could be discovered anew and in completely new ways within the science of the evolutionary process itself.
Read the rest of this article.