Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Nature - Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will

Cool article from Nature Neuroscience - another shot in the war against free will. Most neuroscientists now concede there is no such thing as free will based on their studies of the brain and how it makes decisions (often below the level of our awareness).

Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will

Scientists think they can prove that free will is an illusion. Philosophers are urging them to think again.

Kerri Smith

The experiment helped to change John-Dylan Haynes's outlook on life. In 2007, Haynes, a neuroscientist at the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience in Berlin, put people into a brain scanner in which a display screen flashed a succession of random letters1. He told them to press a button with either their right or left index fingers whenever they felt the urge, and to remember the letter that was showing on the screen when they made the decision. The experiment used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to reveal brain activity in real time as the volunteers chose to use their right or left hands. The results were quite a surprise.

"The first thought we had was 'we have to check if this is real'," says Haynes. "We came up with more sanity checks than I've ever seen in any other study before."

The conscious decision to push the button was made about a second before the actual act, but the team discovered that a pattern of brain activity seemed to predict that decision by as many as seven seconds. Long before the subjects were even aware of making a choice, it seems, their brains had already decided.

As humans, we like to think that our decisions are under our conscious control — that we have free will. Philosophers have debated that concept for centuries, and now Haynes and other experimental neuroscientists are raising a new challenge. They argue that consciousness of a decision may be a mere biochemical afterthought, with no influence whatsoever on a person's actions. According to this logic, they say, free will is an illusion. "We feel we choose, but we don't," says Patrick Haggard, a neuroscientist at University College London.

Go read the whole post - if you are free to decide to do so.


- said...

Interesting article. The author did a good job articulating the problems with those claims. It's a matter of what definitions and premises about free will you use.

I think Glannon is right when he says that "Neuroscientists and philosophers talk past each other". It's sad to see such wonderful fields not working together more often.

I believe free will exists. If it exists, I choose to believe it. If it doesn't, I have no choice but believing it.

Jacques Braga said...

If free will does not exist, then only the Destiny acts upon us...

Jacques Braga said...

If free will does not exist, then only the Destiny acts upon us?...