tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13617569.post9000394268116364182..comments2024-03-27T02:13:58.088-07:00Comments on Integral Options Cafe: Lee Smolin Argues Against the Timeless Multiversewilliam harrymanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06981478282688361274noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13617569.post-90100736773250143232009-11-08T09:04:04.731-07:002009-11-08T09:04:04.731-07:00If there is someone who want to know something abo...If there is someone who want to know something about "the problem of time", he can look the new Lorentz Transformation on:<br /><br /> http://vixra.org/abs/0909.0022Xavier Terri Castañéhttp://vixra.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13617569.post-19771908205580803612009-08-05T07:47:12.027-07:002009-08-05T07:47:12.027-07:00I read your book 'Las dudas de la física',...I read your book 'Las dudas de la física', 2007. Wonderful. I have seen that you are looking for a new big idea, the fundamental simply idea for the progress and unification of physics. Seems that you got the conviction that both quantum mechanics and GR theorys don't understand the deep nature of time (page 355). It is right for GR unless.<br /> <br /> Here is what i say:<br /> No more Lorentz's Transformations. The new alternatives transformations ('relational transformations') are deduced on 'La paradoja de los gemelos de la teoría de la relatividad especial de Einstein', f.i., equations (22) and (23) with "C" and "D" given by (42) and (43), pages (33) to (36). From them arises the 'teoría relacional', the alternative to special relativity.<br /> The generalitation of this 'teoría relacional', the unique possible classic alternative to GR, appears on 'Extracto de la Teoría Conectada'. 3 are the fundamental equations: (84), (171) and (172), pages (146) and (182). This 3=24 equations are necessary in order to eliminate the Newton-Einstein's absolute space. There are not absolute accelerations (neither absolute velocities, of course).<br /><br /> THe Dark Matter problem is solved in 'Ápendice C', page 205. And so too many others things.<br /><br /> What about a "quantum teoría conectada"? I believe that you can say something important about it.Xavier Terrihttp://vixra.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13617569.post-84673935202934606582009-07-06T09:54:32.817-07:002009-07-06T09:54:32.817-07:00I agree, the 'Scientific Method' seems to ...I agree, the 'Scientific Method' seems to have gone out of use! Philosophically we need to escape from prejudice and assumption by using more Induction and less Deduction. Contrary to assumption this does NOT mean less imagination! We've had vast amounts of new information coming at us recently, including from the Hubble, Chandra etc, and at the quantum level, but rather than properly examine and consider the implications we're spending our time on unprovable strings and multiverses.<br />The Canterbury Project has been examining the data and using triple helix morphology to find provable answers. It seems the results may challenge a few long held beliefs!<br />The old addage about Physics not moving on till old physicists die seems no longer to be true. They're now largely producing clones of themselves so perhaps it may never move on if we don't open up our minds a bit!<br />CantiumCantiumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08716817389219697297noreply@blogger.com