Tuesday, April 01, 2014

The Impact of Environmental Factors in Severe Psychiatric Disorders

 

This article has been out for almost two months, but I just discovered it. Good timing, too, since I am currently writing an article refuting the new mandate from the National Institutes of Mental Health (NIMH) that dictates an essentially bio-genetic approach to understanding mental illness - and that will reject funding for projects that do not fit that agenda.

Certainly, there are some organic brain diseases, as discussed below (most of which are influenced in some way by the environment, through toxins, stress, injury, and other pathways). However, and this is the BIG however, the majority of the mental illness we encounter in the therapy room is sourced in relational dysfunction: abuse (sexual, physical, emotional, verbal), neglect (both physical and emotional), and other more subtle forms of relational trauma, that if consistent enough, result in anxiety, depression, poor self-image, and/or debilitating core beliefs about themselves and the world.

Until we admit these primary causes of mental illness into the research agenda, we are condemned to continue search for the mythical magic bullet medicine that will cure us of our pain.

Full Citation:
Schmitt, A, Malchow, B, Hasan, A, and Falkai, P. (2014, Feb 11). The impact of environmental factors in severe psychiatric disorders. Frontiers in Neuroscience: Systems Biology. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00019

The impact of environmental factors in severe psychiatric disorders

Andrea Schmitt [1,2], Berend Malchow [1], Alkomiet Hasan [1], and Peter Falkai [1]
1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
2. Laboratory of Neuroscience (LIM27), Institute of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

During the last decades, schizophrenia has been regarded as a developmental disorder. The neurodevelopmental hypothesis proposes schizophrenia to be related to genetic and environmental factors leading to abnormal brain development during the pre- or postnatal period. First disease symptoms appear in early adulthood during the synaptic pruning and myelination process. Meta-analyses of structural MRI studies revealing hippocampal volume deficits in first-episode patients and in the longitudinal disease course confirm this hypothesis. Apart from the influence of risk genes in severe psychiatric disorders, environmental factors may also impact brain development during the perinatal period. Several environmental factors such as antenatal maternal virus infections, obstetric complications entailing hypoxia as common factor or stress during neurodevelopment have been identified to play a role in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, possibly contributing to smaller hippocampal volumes. In major depression, psychosocial stress during the perinatal period or in adulthood is an important trigger. In animal studies, chronic stress or repeated administration of glucocorticoids have been shown to induce degeneration of glucocorticoid-sensitive hippocampal neurons and may contribute to the pathophysiology of affective disorders. Epigenetic mechanisms altering the chromatin structure such as histone acetylation and DNA methylation may mediate effects of environmental factors to transcriptional regulation of specific genes and be a prominent factor in gene-environmental interaction. In animal models, gene-environmental interaction should be investigated more intensely to unravel pathophysiological mechanisms. These findings may lead to new therapeutic strategies influencing epigenetic targets in severe psychiatric disorders.

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder starting at young adulthood (Kendler et al., 1996) with a prevalence of about 1% (Jablensky, 1995; McGrath et al., 2008). Each patient suffers from an individual combination of positive, negative, and affective symptoms as well as cognitive deficits, while the severity of these symptoms can change over time depending on the disease stage. Schizophrenia is characterized by prodromal phases with rather unspecific negative and cognitive symptoms, followed by the acute illness with prevailing positive symptoms (Falkai et al., 2011). Remission of psychosis is often incomplete with negative symptoms or even persisting positive symptoms being present in 30% of the sufferers (Hasan et al., 2012) and increasing to 60% in consideration of functionality (Gaebel et al., 2006). Positive symptoms consist of mainly acoustic hallucinations, delusions, disorganized speech, and disorganized behavior as well as thought disorder. The negative symptoms comprise blunted affect, avolition, anhedonia, asociality, and alogia (Crow, 1980; Andreasen et al., 1995). Apart from affective symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depressive mood, and suicidality), another domain refers to cognitive deficits with diminished episodic memory, executive function, and attention (Hoff et al., 1996, 2005; Heinrichs and Zakzanis, 1998; Albus et al., 2002, 2006), which represent a core feature of the disease and are main predictors for poor social-functioning outcome (Green, 1996).

Affective disorders, including major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder with manic episodes, belong to the most prevalent psychiatric diseases. Being among the severe psychiatric diseases (Alsuwaidan et al., 2009), Major depressive disorder has a lifetime prevalence between 16 and 20% (Williams et al., 2007) while lifetime prevalence of bipolar disorder is around 3% in the general population (Merikangas et al., 2007). According to DSM-IV (American Psychiatric Association, 1994) symptoms include loss of energy, social withdrawal, and melancholia in depressive episodes of both major depression and bipolar disorder, and elation, irritability, increased energy with hyperactivity, racing thoughts, pressured rapid speech, decreased need for sleep and an increased involvement of pleasured activities in manic episodes of bipolar disorder. In bipolar disorder, instability of mood is one of the core symptoms, whereas melancholia is the most common sign of depressive episodes (Meyer and Hautzinger, 2003). Furthermore, apart from affective symptoms, both types of affective disorders display impaired cognitive performance, mainly in attention, memory, and executive tasks (Torres et al., 2007). However, because of the individuality of patient's symptoms, current psychiatric diagnostic manuals are not always valid and major psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and depression are considered as a continuum with different severity of cognitive deficits as common trait (Hill et al., 2013).

In schizophrenia, twin studies show a heritability of about 60–80% (Sullivan et al., 2003), whereas in bipolar disorder and major depression heritability has been estimated to be 6–80 and 32%, respectively (Wray and Gottesman, 2012). Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) revealed a multitude of genetic risk variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNP) with low effect (Schwab and Wildenauer, 2013). New risk SNPs with high significance are located in genes for Zinc finger protein (ZNF804a), transcription factor 4 (TCF4), micro-RNA 137 (Mir137), the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (CACNA1C), and CACNB2, Inter-alpha globulin inhibitor H3 and H5 (ITIH3-ITIH4) as well as ankyrin3 (Ank3) with mostly unknown neurobiological consequences (Schwab and Wildenauer, 2013). Ank3 and CACNA1C are also relevant for bipolar disorder (Ferreira et al., 2008) and CACNB2 has been found to be associated with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium et al., 2013). In a new GWAS study, Ripke et al. (2013) estimated that in schizophrenia about 8.300 SNPs contribute to a common risk of 32%, suggesting that environmental factors interacting with the genetic background contribute to the pathophysiology (Manolio et al., 2009). In schizophrenia, environmental factors are proposed to play a role up to 60% (Benros et al., 2011) (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
http://www.frontiersin.org/files/Articles/75891/fnins-08-00019-HTML/image_m/fnins-08-00019-g001.jpg
Figure 1. Interacting risk genes and environmental factors contribute to increase the risk of schizophrenia. The figure shows the estimated heritability risk to develop schizophrenia as a factor of grade of next of kin. The right side illustrates the contribution of different environmental factors such as infections, obstetric complications, stress periods, and cannabis abuse.

Neurodevelopment and Psychiatric Disorders

During the last decades, schizophrenia has been regarded as a neurodevelopmental disorder. Defective genes and environmental factors may interact to induce symptoms of the disease. The so-called “neurodevelopmental hypothesis” proposes schizophrenia to be related to adverse conditions leading to abnormal brain development during the perinatal period, whereas symptoms of the disease appear in early adulthood after the synaptic pruning process (Weinberger, 1996). In the “two-hit” model, early perinatal insults (genetic background and/or environmental factors) may lead to dysfunction of neuronal circuits and vulnerability to the disease, while a second “hit” during a critical brain development period in adolescence may induce the onset of the disease (Keshavan and Hogarty, 1999). The early perinatal period has been shown to be critical for proper brain development and more specifically the late first and second trimester have been implicated in the pathophysiology of the disease (Fatemi and Folsom, 2009). During adolescence, a synaptic pruning process with excessive elimination of synapses and loss of synaptic plasticity may lead to exacerbation of symptoms in the predisposed brain (Keshavan and Hogarty, 1999; Schmitt et al., 2011a). Additionally, myelination of the heteromodal association cortex like the prefrontal cortex occur during this period (Peters et al., 2012) and decreased fractional anisotropy which corresponds to deficits in myelination has consistently been reported in schizophrenia, suggesting disturbances in fronto-limbic connections (Yao et al., 2013). The prefrontal cortex is highly connected with the hippocampus and this neuronal network has been shown to be disturbed in schizophrenia, mainly due to neurodevelopmental disturbances (Bullmore et al., 1997; Peters et al., 2012; Rapoport et al., 2012). Accordingly, in animal models, perinatal hippocampal lesions induced dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in adulthood (Lipska, 2004). The disconnection of the hippocampus during brain development alters prefrontal cortical circuitry, function and neurocognition such as prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response and represents a potent neurodevelopmental animal model for schizophrenia.

Meta-analyses of structural magnetic resonance imaging studies revealed decreased hippocampal volumes and increased ventricles in first-episode schizophrenia patients, confirming the presence of neuropathology before diagnosis is possible (Steen et al., 2006; Vita et al., 2006; Adriano et al., 2012). Even in patients with ultrahigh risk to develop schizophrenia, diminished gray matter of prefrontal and hippocampal regions has been detected compared to healthy controls and in patients experiencing later transition to schizophrenia these volume deficits were yet more pronounced (Witthaus et al., 2009, 2010; Wood et al., 2010). In a comparative analysis, both schizophrenia patients and patients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder exhibited reduced hippocampal volumes (Maller et al., 2012). Reduced hippocampal volume has also been confirmed in patients with recurrent and chronic depression (Cole et al., 2011). Shape analysis revealed deformations in subfields in the tail of the right hippocampus as well as bilateral volume reductions in patients with first-episode depression (Cole et al., 2010; Meisenzahl et al., 2010), while during the course of the disease further reductions have only been detected in schizophrenia. The presence of alterations in first-episode depression is consistent with a neurodevelopmental hypothesis of early stress experience, especially since the hippocampus plays a major role in inhibiting stress response (McEwen and Magarinos, 2001), providing inhibitory feedback to the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Fanselow, 2000).

Stress During Neurodevelopment

Potential stress-inducing factors are migration and urbanicity, which both have been related to schizophrenia. Meta-analyses show an association with urban environment after controlling for minority status (van Os et al., 2010). Individuals living in a higher degree of urbanization had a higher risk to develop schizophrenia than people living in rural areas with a dose-dependent relationship (Pedersen and Mortensen, 2001). In healthy controls, city living was associated with increased amygdala activity, whereas urban upbringing affected the anterior cingulate cortex, affective, and stress response (Lederbogen et al., 2011). In first- and second-generation migrants as well as in minority groups across all cultures, psychotic symptoms have been shown to be increased (Rapoport et al., 2012). According to the “social defeat hypothesis” it has been assumed that social status and degree, e.g., occupying a minority position or experiencing social exclusion, promotes the development of schizophrenia (van Os et al., 2010).

Maltreated children suffer more likely from severe psychiatric disorders such as major depression, bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, substance abuse and schizophrenia. Childhood maltreatment has been associated with reduced hippocampal volume and amygdala hyperreactivity and also predicts poor treatment outcome (Teicher and Samson, 2013). To date, apart from a genetic vulnerability, stress is widely accepted as risk factor for depression. The stress sensitization hypothesis describes that the first episode of depression sensitizes an individual to stress for which reason subsequent episodes require less stress to be triggered (Shapero et al., 2014). In extension of this hypothesis, early adverse childhood experiences including emotional abuse, physical, and sexual abuse or neglect have been shown to predict depressive symptoms in adulthood (Shapero et al., 2014). Indicating a gene-environment interaction, genetic factors such as polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter or methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase have been reported to interact with developmental stress to increase the risk for depression (Karg et al., 2011; Lok et al., 2013). However, individual genetic background influences the incidence of depression in response to stress and only a part of the persons experiencing stressors develops depression (Keers and Uher, 2012). Moreover, childhood abuse is known to induce psychotic symptoms and suicidal behavior in patients with major depression and bipolar disorder (Arseneault et al., 2011; Tunnard et al., 2014). Early psychotic symptoms represent a risk for developing schizophrenia. In a meta-analysis of 18 case-control studies, Varese et al. (2012) filtered adverse experiences in childhood to significantly increase the risk to develop psychosis and schizophrenia. The neurobiological consequence of stress sensitization involves dysregulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, contributing to dopamine sensitization in mesolimbic areas and increased stress-induced striatal dopamine release (van Winkel et al., 2008).

The major stress system of the body is the HPA axis, a neuroendocrine system involved in the production of the stress hormone cortisol by adrenal glands. In a subset of patients with major depression, but also in patients with severe psychiatric disorder across phenotypic diagnosis, a dysfunction of the HPA axis has been detected (MacKenzie et al., 2007; Kapur et al., 2012). Depressed patients with a history of childhood abuse have enhanced HPA axis response to psychosocial stress and attenuated cortisol response to application of the synthetic corticosteroid dexamethasone (Heim et al., 2000). In animal models, acute or chronic stress decreased BDNF levels in the hippocampus inclusive the dentate gyrus (Neto et al., 2011). Along with this hypothesis, stress is known to reduce hippocampal dendrites (Magarinos et al., 2011). It additionally increases plasma and adrenal corticosterone levels and application of this hormone reduced hippocampal BDNF levels, mimicking stress reaction (Neto et al., 2011). Chronic stress or repeated administration of glucocorticoids results in degeneration of hippocampal neurons with decreased soma size and atrophy of dendrites (Sapolsky et al., 1990; Watanabe et al., 1992). Thus, volume loss in vulnerable brain regions like the hippocampus as reported for affective disorders may indeed be mediated by stress-induced glucocorticoid neurotoxicity (Arango et al., 2001; Frodl and O'Keane, 2013). In an animal model of depression, the learned helplessness paradigm, inescapable stress induces downregulation of stem cell proliferation (neurogenesis) in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (Malberg and Duman, 2003). Stress is additionally known to influence synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex (Rajkowska, 2000). Mediating gene-environmental interactions, epigenetic mechanisms altering chromatin structure such as histone acetylation and DNA methylation may link effects of environmental factors such as stress to transcriptional regulation of specific genes. Depression-like behavior and antidepressant action have been found to be regulated by epigenetic mechanisms (Sun et al., 2013). For example, stress is known to increase histone methylation at the corresponding promoters of the BDNF gene.

Maternal stress during the prenatal period has been related to schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety (Markham and Koenig, 2011), which also applies to autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (Class et al., 2014). It includes maternal psychological stress exposure e.g., due to bereavement, unwantedness of a pregnancy, natural disaster or war experience (Brown, 2002; Spauwen et al., 2004; Sullivan, 2005; Meli et al., 2012). Children of mothers who experienced e.g., death of relatives or other serious life events developed schizophrenia to a higher degree (Khashan et al., 2008). War experience e.g., during world war II or Israel's Six-Day-War has also been regarded as a critical factor (van Os and Selten, 1998; Malaspina et al., 2008). Especially during the first or second trimester of pregnancy, a vulnerable brain development period may exist for those stress factors. Beside schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety are consequences of exposure to gestational stress (Torrey et al., 1996; Watson et al., 1999; Brown et al., 2000). Prenatal stress is known to influence function of the HPA axis and secretion of glucocorticoid hormones as well protective capacity of the placenta (Owen et al., 2005; Weinstock, 2005, 2008). In addition to effects on stress hormones, prenatal stress influences the fetal transcriptome through microRNA (miRNA) regulation as an epigenetic mechanism, which links environmental factors to altered gene expression in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (Zucchi et al., 2013). Among 435 miRNAs, 19% exhibited reduced expression in the prefrontal cortex in schizophrenia, or more pronounced in bipolar disorder (Moreau et al., 2011). While 18 miRNAs have been found to be differentially expressed, the miRNA miR-497 and miR-29c have been validated to be overexpressed in exosomes of the prefrontal cortex of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (Banigan et al., 2013). Moreover, methylation or hydroxymethylation of specific genes or promotors regulates gene expression (Akbarian, 2010). Hypermethylation of sex-determining region Y-box 10 (SOX10) has been reported in schizophrenia, whereas in bipolar disorder hypomethylation of HLA complex group 9 (HCG9), ST6 (alpha-N-acetyl-neuranminyl-2,3-beta-galactosyl-1,3)-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase (ST6GALNAC), and hypermethylation of the serotonin transporter SLCA4 and proline rich membrane anchor 1 (PRIMA1) has been observed (Kato and Iwamoto, 2014). In the frontal cortex of schizophrenia patients, genome-wide methylation analysis revealed differential methylation of 817 genes in promotor regions, among them genes which previously have been associated with schizophrenia (Wockner et al., 2014). Histone modification of chromatin is another epigenetic mechanism to influence gene expression (Peter and Akbarian, 2011). In schizophrenia, altered histone methyltransferases have been detected in the parietal cortex and represent potential future targets for novel treatment strategies (Chase et al., 2013). After prenatal stress in mice, abnormalities in DNA methylation have been described in GABAergic neurons and been related to a schizophrenia-like behavioral phenotype (Matrisciano et al., 2013).

Altered expressions of glucocorticoid receptors and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in the hippocampus and amygdala have been reported to result from prenatal stress and may be related to increased anxiety and depression-related behavior (Markham and Koenig, 2011). Cognitive deficits of working memory, spatial memory and novel object recognition, related to dysfunctions of the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, have repeatedly been associated with prenatal stress in animal models and implicate its relationship to severe psychiatric disorders (Markham and Koenig, 2011). Other behavioral consequences are increased locomotor activity and deficits in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response (PPI) (Koenig et al., 2005). Increased subcortical and decreased prefrontal dopamine activity after prenatal stress interestingly corresponds to neurotransmitter hypotheses of schizophrenia (Carboni et al., 2010). As a correlate of negative symptoms, social interaction has been reported to be decreased in animals with experience of prenatal stress (Lee et al., 2007). Investigating gene-environmental interaction, a social deficit has been revealed in SNAP-25 knockout mice, which represents a synaptic protein involved in neurotransmitter release, combined with prenatal stress paradigm (Oliver and Davies, 2009).

Some retrospective studies investigated consequences of prenatal food starvation during the “Dutch hunger winter 1944–1945” (Susser et al., 1996; Hoek et al., 1998) and Chinese famine during 1959–1961 (St Clair et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2009). In these investigations, famine episodes of mothers were related to increased risk for schizophrenia in the offspring. Exposure to famine has also been associated with mood disorders and antisocial behavior (Lumey et al., 2011) However, these data are based on ecological inquiries and other factors such as prenatal stress, inflammation, obstetric complications, and toxic substances are not controlled for. Despite these limitations, animal studies revealed effects for protein restriction, choline and vitamin D deficiency on dopamine-related behavior such as locomotor activity and sensorimotor gating, cognition and anxiety, or depression-related behaviors (Markham and Koenig, 2011).

Birth and Obstetric Complications

Several meta-analyses have shown an association between complications of pregnancy and delivery and schizophrenia. This applies to obstetric complications of preeclampsia, bleeding, rhesus incompatibility and diabetes, asphyxia, uterine atony, emergency Ceasarian section, and fetal abnormalities such as low birth weight, congenital malformations, and small head circumference. Effect sizes have been estimated between two and three with the highest effect showing emergency Caesarian section, placental abruption, and low birth weight (Cannon et al., 2002a). Schizophrenia has been associated with boys which were small for gestational age at birth (odds ratio 3.2) (Hultman et al., 1999). Children who experienced fetal hypoxia and later developed schizophrenia or affective disorders had basically lower birth weights, indicating that birth weight is a general marker of viability of the intrauterine environment (Fineberg et al., 2013). An odds ratio of 2.0 has been detected by a meta-analysis of Geddes and Lawrie (1995). The same group investigated another meta-analysis of different obstetric complications and found associations between schizophrenia and use of incubator, prematurity and premature rupture of membranes, while low birthweight and use of forceps during delivery were less consistently related to the disorder (Geddes et al., 1999). Maternal bleeding during pregnancy has been found to be associated with schizophrenia with an odds ratio of 3.5 (Hultman et al., 1999). Interestingly, in individuals at high risk for psychosis, those who de facto converted into psychosis had more obstetric complications than non-converting individuals (Mittal et al., 2009). A common factor of all these complications is perinatal hypoxia (Zornberg et al., 2000), which in rats induced a deficit in prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response (PPI) in adulthood. This behavioral correlate to schizophrenia responded to treatment with the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (Schmitt et al., 2007; Fendt et al., 2008).

The PPI paradigm reflects function of a specific network of brain regions, among them the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, striatum, and nucleus accumbens (Swerdlow et al., 2001). Especially the hippocampus and basal ganglia are vulnerable to hypoxia-ischemia in the neonate (Morales et al., 2011). Bilateral hippocampal atrophy has been detected in adolescents with a history of perinatal asphyxia diagnosed as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, along with worse verbal long-term memory (Maneru et al., 2003). In schizophrenia, patients with obstetric complications have shown reduced hippocampal volumes (McNeil et al., 2000; Van Erp et al., 2002; Schulze et al., 2003; Ebner et al., 2008), while no effects have been observed in volumes of basal ganglia (Haukvik et al., 2010). However, effects of antipsychotic medication have to be taken into consideration when investigating brain regions (Lieberman et al., 2005). In patients, fetal hypoxia has been related to increased ventricular size and reduced cortical gray matter (McNeil et al., 2000; Cannon et al., 2002b; Falkai et al., 2003), but results are not consistent (Haukvik et al., 2009). Assessment of the two-dimensional gyrification index (GI) revealed no relationship between obstetric complications and cortical folding (Falkai et al., 2007), but after application of a three-dimensional local GI calculation cortical gyrification has been observed to be reduced in the Broca's area in patients and healthy controls with obstetric complication (Haukvik et al., 2012). Since early stages of gyrification take place during gestational week 16 with a rapid increase in the third trimester (Armstrong et al., 1995), this possibly reflects neurodevelopmental disturbances.

In a meta-analysis of 22 studies, the pooled odds ratio for exposure to obstetric complications and subsequent development of bipolar disorder was 1.01 and for development of major depression 0.61, not supporting the association with affective disorder (Scott et al., 2006). However, in a national register study of 1.3 million Swedes, preterm birth has been significantly associated with affective disorders: those with less than 32 weeks gestation had a 2.9-fold higher risk to develop major depression and 7.4% more likely to have bipolar disorder (Nosarti et al., 2012). In a structural MRI study of 79 patients with bipolar disorder and 140 healthy controls from a Norwegion registry, perinatal asphyxia including a hypoxic state lead to smaller amygdala volumes in the bipolar group with perinatal asphyxia, while the non-psychotic group had an association with smaller hippocampal volumes (Haukvik et al., 2013). This is important for the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder, since meta-analyses have revealed smaller amygdala and hippocampus volumes in lithium-naïve patients with bipolar disorder (Hallahan et al., 2011; Hajek et al., 2012).

The consequences of fetal hypoxia comprise neuronal death, white matter damage with impaired myelination and reduced growth of dendrites with more profound effects at mid than late gestation (Rees et al., 2008). Apart from axonal degeneration, especially oligodendrocytes and periventricular white matter are sensible for the influence of oxygen restriction (Kaur et al., 2006). Additionally, an excess of glutamate via hypofunction of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor, which has been proposed to play a major role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (Hashimoto et al., 2013; Weickert et al., 2013), may damage oligodendroglia and myelin and influence oligodendrocyte differentiation (Mitterauer and Kofler-Westergren, 2011; Cavaliere et al., 2013). Thereby, contributing to cognitive deficits, increased glutamate levels may induce a synaptic imbalance between axons and oligodendroglia, affecting the glial network (syncytium) which is composed of oligodendrocytes and astrocytes (Mitterauer, 2011). In schizophrenia, decreased oligodendrocyte number has been detected in CA4 of the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex (Hof et al., 2003; Schmitt et al., 2009). Although no astrocytosis has been found in schizophrenia (Schmitt et al., 2009), dysfunction of astrocytes may be present in psychiatric disorders (Mitterauer, 2011). At the paranodal junctions between axons and terminal loops of oligodendrocytes, contactin-associated protein is expressed and has been reported to be downregulated in schizophrenia, thus modulating glia-neuronal interaction (Schmitt et al., 2012). In addition to these glial networks, microglia is known to be activated by hypoxic periods and may mediate cell damage via production of nitric oxide synthase, linking neonatal hypoxia to inflammatory processes (Kaur et al., 2006). In the rat model of perinatal hypoxia, cDNA microarray derived analysis revealed synaptic genes like complexin 1, syntaxin 1A, SNAP 25, neuropeptide Y, and neurexin 1 to be deregulated in several cortical regions and striatum during adulthood. In this study, clozapine treatment had effects on gene expression (Sommer et al., 2010). These findings are relevant to schizophrenia, which has been described as a disease of dysconnectivity on the synaptic and systematic level (Schmitt et al., 2011a, 2012).

Inflammation During Pregnancy

As to offspring of mothers exposed to influenza, several epidemiological studies have demonstrated an increased risk for schizophrenia. However, infections with other viruses such as measles, rubella, varicella-zoster, polio, and herpes as well as bacteria and parasites (Toxoplasma gondii) also confer an increased risk of schizophrenia (Hagberg et al., 2012). Moreover, maternal infections and subsequent inflammatory processes and brain injury during pregnancy are known to be associated with preterm labor, especially at <30 weeks of gestation (Dammann et al., 2002; Goldenberg et al., 2008). These complications are known to affect white matter structures such as corpus callosum or other major white matter tracts and may be associated with neurodevelopmental injury of oligodendrocytes in schizophrenia (Chew et al., 2013). In fact, decreased numbers of oligodendrocytes have been detected in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex in post-mortem brains of schizophrenia patients and may affect subsequent myelination (Hof et al., 2002; Schmitt et al., 2009). Pro-inflammatory cytokine release has been described as common mechanism of infectious processes (Brown, 2012; Garbett et al., 2012). In the prefrontal cortex of schizophrenia patients, gene expression analysis revealed increased expression of inflammatory genes along with activation of microglia (Beumer et al., 2012; Fillman et al., 2013), but results in the superior temporal cortex also point to the reduced expression of immune-related genes (Schmitt et al., 2011b). In which manner these post-mortem findings are related to perinatal insults is not yet resolved. In animal studies, maternal infection induced behavioral abnormalities in early adulthood comparable to schizophrenia such as deficits in PPI, social interaction and working memory (Meyer and Feldon, 2009).

Challenging Future Investigations: Gene-Environmental Interaction

Many efforts have been made to unravel the genetic background of severe psychiatric disorders. Recent GWAS point toward a partial overlap in susceptibility between schizophrenia and affective disorders (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium et al., 2013). For example, the risk variant of the alpha 1C subunit of the L-type voltage-gated calcium channel (CACNA1C) gene is associated with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depression (Green et al., 2010). This genotype has been shown to influence hippocampal activation during episodic memory encoding and retrieval (Krug et al., 2013). However, effect sizes for common genetic variants so far were small (Brown, 2011; Réthelyi et al., 2013). Environmental factors, especially those affecting molecular and structural processes in relevant brain regions during neurodevelopment, are supposed to interact with genetic factors to induce severe psychiatric disorders (Harrison and Weinberger, 2005). For example, a large number of schizophrenia candidate genes are known to be regulated by hypoxia (Fatemi and Folsom, 2009; Schmidt-Kastner et al., 2012). In transgenic animal models of schizophrenia, stressful events have been induced to reinforce the behavioral phenotype (Haque et al., 2012; Hida et al., 2013). Future animal studies should combine risk variants of susceptibility genes with several environmental factors such as perinatal infection, stress and hypoxia to develop valid models of severe psychiatric disorders. These models could be useful to understand pathophysiological brain mechanisms and to develop new treatment strategies aiming at risk-based therapy and prevention of symptoms of severe psychiatric disorders.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Berend Malchow declares no conflicts of interest. Alkomiet Hasan has been invited to scientific conferences by Janssen Cilag, Pfizer, and Lundbeck. He received paid speakership by Desitin and is member of the Roche advisory board. Andrea Schmitt was honorary speaker for TAD Pharma and Roche and has been member of the Roche advisory board. Peter Falkai until 12/2011 has been member of the advisory boards of Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Lundback, Pfizer, Lilly, and AstraZeneca and received an educational grant from AstraZeneca and honoraria as lecturer from Janssen-Cilag, BMS, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Lilly, and AstraZeneca.

References are available at the Frontiers site.

Turns Out the Best Diet Is Real Food, Because Science!

Well, imagine that, the best diet for health is one that is based on eating real food, not crap that comes in a box, a bag, or a can. From The Atlantic.

Science Compared Every Diet, and the Winner Is Real Food

Researchers asked if one diet could be crowned best in terms of health outcomes. If diet is a set of rigid principles, the answer is a decisive no. In terms of broader guidelines, it's a decisive yes.

James Hamblin | Mar 24 2014

Ornamental cabbage and kale in Langley, Washington (Dean Fosdick/AP)

Flailing in the swell of bestselling diet books, infomercials for cleanses, and secret tips in glossy magazines, is the credibility of nutrition science. Watching thoroughly-credentialed medical experts tout the addition or subtraction of one nutrient as deliverance—only to change the channel and hear someone equally-thoroughly-credentialed touting the opposite—it can be tempting to write off nutrition advice altogether. This month we hear something is good, and next we almost expect to hear it’s bad. Why not assume the latest research will all eventually be nullified, and just close our eyes and eat whatever tastes best?

That notion is at once relatable and tragic, in that diet is inextricable from the amount of healthy time we spend on Earth. Improvements in diet are clearly associated with significant lengthening of lifespan and dramatic decreases in risk of most chronic diseases. Combining disease and longevity into the concept of healthspan, the number of healthy years of life—fundamentally more important but less readily quantifiable than lifespan—the data in favor of optimizing our diets are even more compelling. No one is arguing that diet is less than extremely important to health and well-being, but seemingly everyone is arguing as to what constitutes the best diet.

The voices that carry the farthest over the sea of diet recommendations are those of iconoclasts—those who promise the most for the least, and do so with certainty. Amid the clamor, Dr. David Katz is emerging as an iconoclast on the side of reason. At least, that’s how he describes himself. From his throne at Yale University's Prevention Research Center, where he is a practicing physician and researcher, said sea of popular diet media is the institution against which he rebels. It’s not that nutrition science is corrupt, just that the empty promises of memetic, of-the-moment diet crazes are themselves junk food. To Katz they are more than annoying and confusing; they are dangerous injustice.

Scientific publisher Annual Reviews asked Katz to compare the medical evidence for and against every mainstream diet. He says they came to him because of his penchant for dispassionate appraisals. "I don't have a dog in the fight," he told me. “I don’t care which diet is best. I care about the truth."

Katz and Yale colleague Stephanie Meller published their findings in the current issue of the journal in a paper titled, "Can We Say What Diet Is Best for Health?" In it, they compare the major diets of the day: Low carb, low fat, low glycemic, Mediterranean, mixed/balanced (DASH), Paleolithic, vegan, and elements of other diets. Despite the pervasiveness of these diets in culture and media, Katz and Meller write, "There have been no rigorous, long-term studies comparing contenders for best diet laurels using methodology that precludes bias and confounding. For many reasons, such studies are unlikely." They conclude that no diet is clearly best, but there are common elements across eating patterns that are proven to be beneficial to health. "A diet of minimally processed foods close to nature, predominantly plants, is decisively associated with health promotion and disease prevention."
 
 
Katz, Meller/Annual Reviews

Among the salient points of proven health benefits the researchers note, nutritionally-replete plant-based diets are supported by a wide array of favorable health outcomes, including fewer cancers and less heart disease. These diets ideally included not just fruits and vegetables, but whole grains, nuts, and seeds. Katz and Meller found "no decisive evidence" that low-fat diets are better than diets high in healthful fats, like the Mediterranean. Those fats include a lower ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids than the typical American diet.

The Mediterranean diet, which is additionally defined by high intake of fiber, moderate alcohol and meat intake, antioxidants, and polyphenols, does have favorable effects on heart disease, cancer risk, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and "is potentially associated with defense against neurodegenerative disease and preservation of cognitive function, reduced inflammation, and defense against asthma."

They also found carbohydrate-selective diets to be better than categorically low-carbohydrate diets, in that incorporating whole grains is associated with lower risks for cancers and better control of body weight. Attention to glycemic load and index is "sensible at the least." Eating foods that have high glycemic loads (which Katz says is much more relevant to health outcomes than glycemic index—in that some quality foods like carrots have very high indices, which could be misleading) is associated with greater risk of heart disease.

Finally, in a notable blow to some interpretations of the Paleo diet, Katz and Meller wrote, "if Paleolithic eating is loosely interpreted to mean a diet based mostly on meat, no meaningful interpretation of health effects is possible." They note that the composition of most meat in today's food supply is not similar to that of mammoth meat, and that most plants available during the Stone Age are today extinct. (Though it wouldn't surprise me to learn that Paleo extremists are crowd-funding a Jurassic Park style experiment to bring them back.)

Just because Katz is not one to abandon his scientific compass under duress of passion does not mean he is without passion, or unmoved by it in his own ways. The subjects of media headlines and popular diet books are dark places for Katz. "It’s not just linguistic, I really at times feel like crying, when I think about that we’re paying for ignorance with human lives," he told me. "At times, I hate the people with alphabet soup after their names who are promising the moon and the stars with certainty. I hate knowing that the next person is already rubbing his or her hands together with the next fad to make it on the bestseller list."

"The evidence that with knowledge already at our disposal, we could eliminate 80 percent of chronic disease is the basis for everything I do," Katz said. Just as he was finishing his residency in internal medicine in 1993, influential research in the Journal of the American Medical Association ("Actual Causes of Death in the United States") put diet on a short list of the lifestyle factors blamed for half of deaths in 1990. "Here we are more than 20 years later and we’ve made just about no progress."

A nod to the fact that popular media is not totally lost, Katz borrows from the writer Michael Pollan, citing a seminal 2007 New York Times Magazine article on "nutritionism" in concluding that the mantra, "Eat food, not too much, mostly plants" is sound. "That’s an excellent idea, and yet somehow it turns out to be extremely radical."

Though Katz also says it isn’t nearly enough. "That doesn't help you pick the most nutritious bread, or the best pasta sauce. A member of the foodie elite might say you shouldn't eat anything from a bag, box, bottle, jar, or can." That's admittedly impractical. "We do need to look at all the details that populate the space between where we are and where we want to be."

The current review is in pursuit of that, as is a system for determining the nutritional value of foods that Katz recently spent two years developing. It's called NuVal, and it offers consumers a single numeric value to determine foods' worth, as opposed to a complex nutritional panel. The number does things like differentiate intrinsic from added nutrients. "If you don’t do that, the best thing in the whole damn food supply is Total cereal. Total is basically a completely vapid flake delivery system for multivitamins. You could skip the cereal and take the multivitamin."

"If you eat food direct from nature," Katz added, "you don’t even need to think about this. You don't have to worry about trans fat or saturated fat or salt—most of our salt comes from processed food, not the salt shaker. If you focus on real food, nutrients tend to take care of themselves."

The ultimate point of this diet review, which is framed like a tournament, is that there is no winner. More than that, antagonistic talk in pursuit of marketing a certain diet, emphasizing mutual exclusivity—similar to arguments against bipartisan political rhetoric—is damaging to the entire system and conversation. Exaggerated emphasis on a single nutrient or food is inadvisable. The result, Katz and Meller write, is a mire of perpetual confusion and doubt. Public health could benefit on a grand scale from a unified front in health media: Endorsement of the basic theme of what we do know to be healthful eating and candid acknowledgement of the many details we do not know.

"I think Bertrand Russell nailed it," Katz told me, "when he said that the whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are so sure, and wise people always have doubts. Something like that."

RSA - From Self to Selfie: Simon Blackburn

Simon Blackburn is the author of Mirror, Mirror: The Uses and Abuses of Self-Love (March 2014). Here is the synopsis of the book from Amazon:
Everyone deplores narcissism, especially in others. The vain are by turns annoying or absurd, offending us whether they are blissfully oblivious or proudly aware of their behavior. But are narcissism and vanity really as bad as they seem? Can we avoid them even if we try? In Mirror, Mirror, Simon Blackburn, the author of such best-selling philosophy books as Think, Being Good, and Lust, says that narcissism, vanity, pride, and self-esteem are more complex than they first appear and have innumerable good and bad forms. Drawing on philosophy, psychology, literature, history, and popular culture, Blackburn offers an enlightening and entertaining exploration of self-love, from the myth of Narcissus and the Christian story of the Fall to today's self-esteem industry.

A sparkling mixture of learning, humor, and style, Mirror, Mirror examines what great thinkers have said about self-love--from Aristotle, Cicero, and Erasmus to Rousseau, Adam Smith, Kant, and Iris Murdoch. It considers today's "me"-related obsessions, such as the "selfie," plastic surgery, and cosmetic enhancements, and reflects on connected phenomena such as the fatal commodification of social life and the tragic overconfidence of George W. Bush and Tony Blair. Ultimately, Mirror, Mirror shows why self-regard is a necessary and healthy part of life. But it also suggests that we have lost the ability to distinguish--let alone strike a balance--between good and bad forms of self-concern.
The video below is a highlight reel, so to speak, of his full talk at the RSA (there is a link to the podcast of the full talk with the Q and A that followed).

From Self to Selfie

13 Mar 2014


When "selfie" became the Oxford Dictionaries word of the year in 2013 many saw it as symptomatic of the triumph of the self-absorbed, individualistic "because-I'm-worth-it" generation. But is narcissism always to be deplored? Isn't a measure of self-regard a healthy necessity - and could we avoid it even if we tried?

Acclaimed academic philosopher and author Simon Blackburn visits the RSA to explore the history of self-love through the writings of great thinkers from Aristotle to Adam Smith, Kant and Iris Murdoch - and to reflect on its contemporary manifestations - from the rise in cosmetic surgery and the burgeoning self-esteem industry, to the tragic over-confidence of Bush and Blair and the fatal commodification of social life.

Speaker: Simon Blackburn, philosopher and author of "Mirror, Mirror: The Uses and Abuses of Self-Love" (Princeton University Press, 2014).

Chair: Jonathan Rowson, director, Social Brain Centre, RSA

To find out more about this talk, visit the event page.

Listen to the podcast of the full event including audience Q&A.
Follow the RSA on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/thersaorg
Like the RSA on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/thersaorg

Monday, March 31, 2014

How Does Mindfulness Improve Self-Control? (from Greater Good)

This excellent article, from UC Berkeley's Greater Good Science Center, looks at recent research (by talking with the author of the research) that suggests a mindfulness practice can increase our sense of self-control. This is part of the Mindful Monday series from Greater Good.

How Does Mindfulness Improve Self-Control? 

By Emily Nauman | March 24, 2014

In a new installment of our Mindful Monday series, we talk with researcher Rimma Teper about how mindfulness helps improve executive function. 


We have emotions for a reason. Anger in response to injustice can signal that the situation needs to change; sadness in response to loss can signal that we’d like to keep the people we love in our lives.


Our Mindful Mondays series provides ongoing coverage of the exploding field of mindfulness research. Dan Archer

It’s when we ruminate, or get caught up in our emotions, that they might become maladaptive. That’s when emotion regulation can be helpful and healthy.

Previous research has shown that mindfulness can be an effective tool to help regulate our emotions. But why? A new model suggests that the ability to control one’s behavior—a concept that researchers call executive control—may play a role.

In a recent paper published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, researcher Rimma Teper and her colleagues at the University of Toronto write that, despite the common misconception that meditation “empties our head” of emotions, mindfulness actually helps us become more aware and accepting of emotional signals—which helps us to control our behavior.

I talked with Rimma Teper about how mindfulness relates to emotion regulation, and how executive control fits into the picture.

Emily Nauman: In your paper, you write that mindfulness helps us change our attitude toward an emotion, rather than focusing on changing an emotion itself. What is the difference between changing our relationship to an emotion and changing the emotion itself? What’s beneficial about the former?

Rimma Teper: I should start off by saying that I am of the view that emotional experiences are mostly a good thing! We, as humans, evolved to have emotional responses to certain situations that actually help us in our everyday lives.

For instance, feeling fear when you see a snake signals that you should stay away. Feeling love for your family and friends promotes behaviors that foster close relationships. Of course, there are cases where emotional responses may be overblown, or maladaptive—and this is where emotion regulation becomes a necessary tool. Mindfulness is just one strategy that can help with emotion regulation.

As you mentioned, most emotion regulation strategies that people engage in change the nature of the emotion. These strategies may include reevaluating the situation that elicited the emotion, or suppressing the emotion altogether through distraction or some other means. Mindfulness, on the other hand, encourages people to observe their emotional experiences without trying to change them.

I think that one benefit of this approach is that it discards the tendency of “labeling” one’s emotions as good or bad. It encourages people to simply observe the contents of their mind. In this way, I think that mindfulness allows for greater self-insight.

So for instance, if I feel angry, I might try to observe my thoughts without getting caught up in them. I would also pay attention to the bodily sensations that accompany that emotion, like my heart beating quickly. By paying attention to way in which the emotion unfolds in your body, step-by-step, mindful people are able delay and dampen the rumination or overblown reaction that often accompanies it.



EN: What is executive control, and why did you suspect that executive control plays a role in the link between mindfulness and emotion regulation?

RT: Executive control can often be equated with willpower. There are a number of skills that fall under the umbrella of executive control, but the one that is specifically related to mindfulness is the ability to inhibit one’s impulses.

Previous research, including some of our own, has suggested that mindfulness may help to improve executive control. In addition, a lot of previous research has also linked mindfulness to improvements in emotion regulation.

But no one really knew exactly how mindfulness improved emotion regulation. This “gap” in the research made us wonder whether executive control might be the pathway through which mindful people are better able to regulate their emotions.

After all, executive control involves the inhibition of automatic or impulsive behaviors. And for most of us, getting carried away with our emotions is something we do automatically and without notice. When we feel sad or angry, we often let our emotions snowball. We also often ruminate about negative things that have happened to us. So to us, it made sense that executive control would be involved in curbing these maladaptive patterns.

EN: How have people thought about mindfulness and emotion regulation in the past, and what insights does your model bring to our understanding of how mindfulness and emotion regulation are related?

RT: The link between mindfulness and improved emotion regulation is certainly not a new one. What our model does is examine the nature of this relationship and helps to understand how mindfulness may improve emotion regulation.

There is often a misconception that mindfulness simply leads to less emotionality, or that mindful people experience less emotion.

Our model proposes that this is not the case. Specifically, we suggest that mindfulness leads to improvements in emotion regulation not by eliminating or reducing emotional experience, but rather through a present-moment awareness and acceptance of emotional experience. This sort of attentive and open stance towards one’s own emotions and thoughts allows the individual to still experience emotion, but also to detect emotions early on and stop them from spiraling out of control.

EN: How can we apply the insights of this model to our daily lives? What’s useful about understanding that mindfulness helps us become aware of and accept emotions, rather than “emptying our head” of emotions?

RT: As I mentioned before, emotions are usually a good thing! But there are also cases when they can be disruptive and maladaptive.

So rather than getting rid of emotional experience altogether, our model provides insight into the ways in which we can prevent or limit the disruptive aspects of emotions, like rumination. And this can be done by monitoring your thoughts and sensations, but also by adopting a non-judgmental attitude towards them.

Jose Luis Stevens: Awaken the Inner Shaman (Sounds True)

From Sounds True, Tami Simon speaks with former psychotherapist and current shaman, Dr. José Luis Stevens, about his new book with Sounds True, Awaken the Inner Shaman: A Guide to the Power Path of the Heart.

Tuesday, March 25, 2014 
Jose-Luis-Stevens.jpg Tami Simon speaks with Dr. José Luis Stevens, a leading shamanic teacher who brings indigenous wisdom to personal and organizational challenges. José is the cofounder of the Power Path School of Shamanism and the author of 18 books and ebooks, including his latest book with Sounds True, Awaken the Inner Shaman: A Guide to the Power Path of the Heart. In this episode, Tami speaks with José about what the Inner Shaman is and how we can access it through practice and surrender. He explores shamanic ways of seeing, relating to your body, and actualizing your potential. José also examines the questions of trust and faith for both the Inner Shaman and the unfolding of world events. (68 minutes)

Play

Download »
Read Transcript »

more from Jose Luis Stevens:
Awaken the Inner Shaman
Awaken the Inner Shaman

Here is a description of the book:
Within you is a greater, wiser self that is not bound by your fears, worries, or perceived limitations. Dr. José Luis Stevens calls this the Inner Shaman—the part of you that connects directly to the true source of the universe. "The shamans of every tradition know that the physical world we can see and touch is a mere shadow of the true spirit world," writes Dr. Stevens. With Awaken the Inner Shaman, he presents a direct and practical guide for opening our eyes to the greater wisdom and knowing within—and stepping into the power and responsibility we possess to shape and serve our world. In this rousing and provocative book, he invites readers to discover:
  • What is the Inner Shaman? How an understanding of our deeper spiritual potential shows up in every mystical and scientific tradition.
  • Seeing through the heart—why the heart offers us the most immediate path for accessing the Inner Shaman
  • Illuminating the Inner Shaman through spirituality, quantum physics, medical science, and experiential knowing
  • The Inner Shaman in action—how to stop living from the egoic mind and put your true essence in charge
  • Eight tools to strengthen your connection to the Inner Shaman, and much more
Humanity has become enthralled by the Siren’s song of technological progress, which has lured us away from the spiritual source that truly sustains us. In Awaken the Inner Shaman, Dr. José Stevens challenges us to reclaim our lost power to heal, see truly, and fulfill our purpose in life. As Dr. Stevens writes: "The Inner Shaman, suppressed and ignored for centuries, can be discovered in the most obvious place possible—within your own heart."

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Rebecca Goldstein, Plato at the Googlepex - Authors@Google


Philosopher-novelist Rebecca Goldstein (wife of Steven Pinker) has a new book out, Plato at the Googleplex: Why Philosophy Won't Go Away (2014). Recently, she stopped by Google to talk about her new book.

Rebecca Goldstein - Authors@Google

Published on Mar 27, 2014

Goldstein returns to Google, this time with Plato, to talk about her new book.
Abstract from Goldstein's site: "At the heart of the latest work from acclaimed philosopher and novelist Rebecca Newberger Goldstein lies one question: is philosophy obsolete? In PLATO AT THE GOOGLEPLEX (Pantheon Books/March 4, 2014), Goldstein proves why philosophy is here to stay -- and in fact more relevant today than ever before -- by revealing its hidden (though essential) role in today's debates on religion, morality, politics, and science. Goldstein does so in a wholly unique way -- by imagining Plato (the original philosopher) come to life in the twenty-first century. As he embarks on a multicity speaking tour, Goldstein asks: how would Plato handle a host on FOX News who denies that there can be morality without religion? How would he mediate a debate between a Freudian psychoanalyst and a Tiger Mom on how to raise the perfect child? How would he answer a neuroscientist who, about to scan Plato's brain, argues that science has definitively answered the questions of free will and moral agency? And what would Plato make of Google, and the idea that knowledge can be crowdsourced rather than reasoned out by experts? Goldstein also provides an in-depth study of Plato's views, while examining the culture responsible for producing them. With scholarly depth and a novelist's imagination and wit, she probes the deepest issues confronting our time, by allowing us to understand the source of Plato's theories, and to eavesdrop as he takes on the modern world."

The Biocentric Multiverse - An Example of [Eroneously] Collapsing the Subjective and the Objective


A few years ago (2009), Dr. Robert Lanza published Biocentrism: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe, a model he claims positions consciousness as foundation of the universe as we know it. In essence, he argues that our consciousness of the universe brings it into being, which is based on a faulty understanding of quantum mechanics.

Lanza, like Deepak Chopra and B Alan Wallace, relies on a misunderstanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle to suggest that observation is necessary to the determination of the state of a quantum system. But there is research that disproves this interpretation.

First, here is an excellent explanation of Heisenberg's model (Geoff Brumfiel, Nature News, Sept 11, 2012):
At the foundation of quantum mechanics is the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Simply put, the principle states that there is a fundamental limit to what one can know about a quantum system. For example, the more precisely one knows a particle's position, the less one can know about its momentum, and vice versa. The limit is expressed as a simple equation that is straightforward to prove mathematically.

Heisenberg sometimes explained the uncertainty principle as a problem of making measurements. His most well-known thought experiment involved photographing an electron. To take the picture, a scientist might bounce a light particle off the electron's surface. That would reveal its position, but it would also impart energy to the electron, causing it to move. Learning about the electron's position would create uncertainty in its velocity; and the act of measurement would produce the uncertainty needed to satisfy the principle.
He then reports some research [Rozema, L. A. et al. 2012. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(100404)] that supports the belief that measurement does not always introduce more uncertainty in a system:
The researchers made a ‘weak’ measurement of the photon’s polarization in one plane — not enough to disturb it, but enough to produce a rough sense of its orientation. Next, they measured the polarization in the second plane. Then they made an exact, or 'strong', measurement of the first polarization to see whether it had been disturbed by the second measurement.

When the researchers did the experiment multiple times, they found that measurement of one polarization did not always disturb the other state as much as the uncertainty principle predicted. In the strongest case, the induced fuzziness was as little as half of what would be predicted by the uncertainty principle.
This research doesn't do away with the uncertainty principle, but it does demonstrate that it is possible to measure some features of a quantum system without introducing noise into the system.

A related idea is the Shroedinger's Cat thought experiment, which is often taken as proof of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. This model proposes that the act of observing a system results in the collapse of all possible states into one state, the observed state. This is known as the wavefunction collapse. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is one of the six basic tenets of the Copenhagen interpretation, a term that is actually a misnomer in that there was never any coherent interpretation associated with this model. The notion that there was a Copenhagen interpretation arose when Heisenberg used it in his refutation of David Bohm's model, a move he later regretted.

[Bohm's model, the implicate, explicate, and generative orders (via Wikipedia), proposes that
"things, such as particles, objects, and indeed subjects" exist as "semi-autonomous quasi-local features" of an underlying activity. These features can be considered to be independent only up to a certain level of approximation in which certain criteria are fulfilled.
Bohm, working with the then Stanford-based neuroscientist, Karl Pribram, extended this into a holonomic model of the brain.]

One of the more difficult aspects of the Copenhagen model, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, was also known as the EPR paradox, developed by  Albert Einstein and his colleagues Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen. One of the issues Einstein noted with the then-standard model of quantum mechanics is that it allowed for a version of quantum entanglement that violates the general theory of relativity - i.e., that nothing moves faster than the speed of light. But Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle allowed for exactly that, so the EPR paradox was developed. Via Wikipedia:
Heisenberg's principle was an attempt to provide a classical explanation of a quantum effect sometimes called non-locality. According to EPR there were two possible explanations. Either there was some interaction between the particles, even though they were separated, or the information about the outcome of all possible measurements was already present in both particles.
The EPR authors (EPR combines the first letter of the three men's last names) preferred the latter of these two explanations, which allowed that the general relativity remained intact. The EPR solution to the problem was local hidden variables, but Bell's Theorem has since been accepted as a successful refutation of the hidden variables.

A more recent model, the Relational quantum mechanics (RQM) model, developed by Carlo Rovelli in 1994, offers a way out of one of the more difficult aspects of the Copenhagen model, the EPR paradox. The RQM treats the state of a quantum system as being observer-dependent, that is, the state is the relation between the observer and the system.

Again, from Wikipedia:
The physical content of the theory is not to do with objects themselves, but the relations between them. As Rovelli puts it: "Quantum mechanics is a theory about the physical description of physical systems relative to other systems, and this is a complete description of the world".[2]

The essential idea behind RQM is that different observers may give different accounts of the same series of events: for example, to one observer at a given point in time, a system may be in a single, "collapsed" eigenstate, while to another observer at the same time, it may appear to be in a superposition of two or more states. Consequently, if quantum mechanics is to be a complete theory, RQM argues that the notion of "state" describes not the observed system itself, but the relationship, or correlation, between the system and its observer(s). The state vector of conventional quantum mechanics becomes a description of the correlation of some degrees of freedom in the observer, with respect to the observed system. However, it is held by RQM that this applies to all physical objects, whether or not they are conscious or macroscopic (all systems are quantum systems). Any "measurement event" is seen simply as an ordinary physical interaction, an establishment of the sort of correlation discussed above. The proponents of the relational interpretation argue that the approach clears up a number of traditional interpretational difficulties with quantum mechanics, while being simultaneously conceptually elegant and ontologically parsimonious.
The RQM model offers the best solution to the EPR Paradox, and it does so without relying on super-luminal information transfer (faster than the speed of light):
Thus the relational interpretation, by shedding the notion of an "absolute state" of the system, allows for an analysis of the EPR paradox which neither violates traditional locality constraints, nor implies superluminal information transfer, since we can assume that all observers are moving at comfortable sub-light velocities. And, most importantly, the results of every observer are in full accordance with those expected by conventional quantum mechanics.
Returning specifically the Biocentrism model of Lanza, (a condensed matter physicist) and Ajita Kamal (an evolutionary biologist) offered a great "debunking" of Lanza's model, noting that it is the philosophical stance known as idealism masquerading as science. The title of their article (2009) is "Biocentrism Demystified: A Response to Deepak Chopra and Robert Lanza’s Notion of a Conscious Universe," posted at Nirmukta.

Here is one small section in which they correct Lanza's misrepresentation of objective reality:
Lanza says “Space and time are simply the mind’s tools for putting everything together.” This is true , but there is a difference between being the ‘mind’s tools’ and being created by the mind itself. In the first instance the conscious perception of space and time is an experiential trick that the mind uses to make sense of the objective universe, and in the other space and time are actual physical manifestations of the mind. The former is tested and true while the latter is an idealistic notion that is not supported by science. The experiential conception of space and time is different from objective space and time that comprise the universe. This difference is similar to how color is different from photon frequency. The former is subjective while the latter is objective.

Can Lanza deny all the evidence that, whereas we humans emerged on the scene very recently, our Earth and the solar system and the universe at large have been there all along? What about all the objective evidence that life forms have emerged and evolved to greater and greater complexity, resulting in the emergence of humans at a certain stage in the evolutionary history of the Earth? What about all the fossil evidence for how biological and other forms of complexity have been evolving? How can humans arrogate to themselves the power to create objective reality?
Here is more from their long and erudite article, this section dealing with the many worlds model, another approach based on a dissatisfaction with the Copenhagen model:
Hugh Everett, during the mid-1950s, expressed total dissatisfaction with the Copenhagen interpretation: ‘The Copenhagen Interpretation is hopelessly incomplete because of its a priori reliance on classical physics … as well as a philosophic monstrosity with a “reality” concept for the macroscopic world and denial of the same for the microcosm.’ The Copenhagen interpretation implied that equations of quantum mechanics apply only to the microscopic world, and cease to be relevant in the macroscopic or ‘real’ world.

Everett offered a new interpretation, which presaged the modern ideas of quantum decoherence. Everett’s ‘many worlds’ interpretation of quantum mechanics is now taken more seriously, although not entirely in its original form. He simply let the mathematics of the quantum theory show the way for understanding logically the interface between the microscopic world and the macroscopic world. He made the observer an integral part of the system being observed, and introduced a universal wave function that applies comprehensively to the totality of the system being observed and the observer. This means that even macroscopic objects exist as quantum superpositions of all allowed quantum states. There is thus no need for the discontinuity of a wave-function collapse when a measurement is made on the microscopic quantum system in a macroscopic world.

Many worlds
Wave function bifurcation

Everett examined the question: What would things be like if no contributing quantum states to a superposition of states are banished artificially after seeing the results of an observation? He proved that the wave function of the observer would then bifurcate at each interaction of the observer with the system being observed. Suppose an electron can have two possible quantum states A and B, and its wave function is a linear superposition of these two. The evolution of the composite or universal wave function describing the electron and the observer would then contain two branches corresponding to each of the states A and B. Each branch has a copy of the observer, one which sees state A as a result of the measurement, and the other which sees state B. In accordance with the all-important principle of linear superposition in quantum mechanics, the branches do not influence each other, and each embarks on a different future (or a different ‘universe’), independent of the other. The copy of the observer in each universe is oblivious to the existence of other copies of itself and other universes, although the ‘full reality’ is that each possibility has actually happened. This reasoning can be made more abstract and general by removing the distinction between the observer and the observed, and stating that, at each interaction among the components of the composite system, the total or universal wave function would bifurcate as described above, giving rise to multiple universes or many worlds.

A modern and somewhat different version of this interpretation of quantum mechanics introduces the term quantum decoherence to rationalise how the branches become independent, and how each turns out to represent our classical or macroscopic reality. Quantum computing is now a reality, and it is based on such understanding of quantum mechanics.
And, finally, if one is to deal with Lanza's model, then one must deal with the definition of consciousness, a definition that is largely not agreed upon by an two theorists, it seems. Here is the refutation of Lanza's model on the grounds that he hopelessly muddles the definition of consciousness:
One criticism of biocentrism comes from the philosopher Daniel Dennett, who says “It looks like an opposite of a theory, because he doesn’t explain how consciousness happens at all. He’s stopping where the fun begins.”

The logic behind this criticism is obvious. Without a descriptive explanation for consciousness and how it ‘creates’ the universe, biocentrism is not useful. In essence, Lanza calls for the abandonment of modern theoretical physics and its replacement with a magical solution. Here are a few questions that one might ask of the idea:
  1. What is this consciousness?
  2. Why does this consciousness exist?
  3. What is the nature of the interaction between this consciousness and the universe?
  4. Is the problem of infinite regression applicable to consciousness itself?
  5. Even if Lanza’s interpretation of the anthropic principle is a valid argument against modern theoretical physics, does the biocentric model of consciousness create a bigger ontological problem than the one it attempts to solve?
And this:
Consider this statement by Lanza:
Consciousness cannot exist without a living, biological creature to embody its perceptive powers of creation.
How can consciousness create the universe if it doesn’t exist? How can the “living, biological creature” exist if the universe has not been created yet? It becomes apparent that Lanza is muddling the meaning of the word ‘consciousness.’ In one sense he equates it to subjective experience that is tied to a physical brain. In another, he assigns to consciousness a spatio-temporal logic that exists outside of physical manifestation. In this case, the above questions become: 1. What is this spatio-temporal logic?; 2. Why does this spatio-temporal logic exist? and so on…

The Cartesian Theater
The Cartesian Theater

Daniel Dennett’s criticism of biocentrism centres on Lanza’s non-explanation of the nature of consciousness. In fact, even from a biological perspective Lanza’s conception of consciousness is unclear. For example, he consistently equates consciousness with subjective experience while stressing its independence from the objective universe (see Lanza’s quote below). This is an appeal to the widespread but erroneous intuition towards Cartesian Dualism. In this view, consciousness (subjective experience) belongs to a different plane of reality than the one on which the material universe is constructed. Lanza requires this general definition of consciousness to construct his theory of biocentrism. He uses it in the same way that Descartes used it – as a semantic tool to deconstruct reality. In fact, Lanza’s theory of biocentrism is a sophisticated non-explanation for the ‘brain in a vat’ problem that plagued philosophers for centuries. However, instead of subscribing to Cartesian Dualism, he attempts a Cartesian Monism by invoking quantum mechanics. To be exact, his view is Monistic Idealism - the idea that consciousness is everything- but the Cartesian bias is an essential element in his arguments.
Lanza's model relies on a form of dualism that is disguised as idealistic monism.

Furthermore, his denial of any scientific understanding of consciousness is a straw man argument and it is empty, considering that Lanza proposes no useful mechanism for consciousness, nor a definition, but still gives it a central role in his theory of the universe.

For me, the Relational quantum mechanics model offers the best solution to many of the problems of quantum theory, including the role of consciousness. It is an essentially postmodern model of physics, while much of earlier quantum theory is still bogged down in an mechanistic model.

All of that is simply my way of saying that the article below, a defense of the Biocentric model from Jonathan Lyons at Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies is sadly misguided.

A Biocentric Multiverse



Jønathan Lyons

Ethical Technology

Posted: Mar 24, 2014

I’ve been thinking of ways in which Biocentric Universe Theory and multiverse theory could both be true. What if our nature as conscious beings inhabiting a multiverse of endless possibilities, where we are quantum-superposition beings, actually all adds up to us creating the multiverse, while perceiving time and space only within the limitations of our immediately observable, three-spatial/one-time-dimensional universe?

Down the rabbit hole!



Big Guns in the physics community are embracing multiverse theory more and more. One interpretation of this theory is that everything that can possibly happen, does happen, in one universe or another.

Background: Robert Lanza’s Biocentric Universe Theory

Robert Paul Lanza is an American medical doctor, scientist, Chief Scientific Officer of Advanced Cell Technology and Adjunct Professor at the Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine. (For more on Dr. Lanza, and for some fascinating essays and articles containing further insight into Biocentric Universe Theory, visit his Website: http://www.robertlanza.com/


  • At subatomic level, everything exists in an undefined state until observed
  • Example: Double-slit experiment
  • The Observer Effect
  • Because of this evidence, holds Biocentric Universe Theory, it is consciousness that creates the universe as we know it, and not the other way around.
Each but the last of those statements is experimentally proven; the last is a tantalizing possibility, and one I wish to continue to learn about.

A multiverse — that is, an infinite number of universes — could be stacked one on top of the other in even a tiny, single, spatial dimension in addition to the three spatial dimensions and single time dimension we experience. And in an eleven-dimensional multiverse, there are plenty of dimensions left to go around after we account for the four we can perceive.

al outcomes. Next, consider the observer effect: That the universe does not become solid until it is observed is demonstrated by the dual-slit experiment and the observer effect. What this means is that at the subatomic level, the entire universe exists as a colossal Schroedinger Probability wave, existing only as potentialites.

Until, that is, it is observed.

At that point the wave function collapses from whatever probabilities were possible to the single, actual outcome. Before it is observed. the universe exists in a superposition:
Quantum superposition is a fundamental principle of quantum mechanics that holds that a physical system—such as an electron—exists partly in all its particular theoretically possible states (or, configuration of its properties) simultaneously; but when measured or observed, it gives a result corresponding to only one of the possible configurations (as described in interpretation of quantum mechanics).”
In Biocentric Universe Theory, as I mentioned, consciousness thereby gives rise to the universe, and not the other way around. It does so through the act of observation. In observing the universe, we cause the collapse of the Probability Wave to its single outcome. In our universe, anyway.

What if the act of observation is the tool by which new universes are created?

Comic Interlude: An actual product you can buy over at ThinkGeek: “$20 kit produces trillions of universes."

Are you willing to take on the responsibility that comes with bringing trillions of universes into existence, each teeming with sentient life? That's something to ponder before plunking down $20 for this make-your-own-universe kit, created by <artist Jonathon Keats.

If two events are possible, quantum theory assumes that both occur simultaneously - until an observer determines the outcome. For example, in Schrödinger's famous thought experiment, in which his cat may have been killed with a 50 per cent probability, the cat is both alive and dead until someone checks. When the observation is made, the universe splits into two, one for each possible outcome. For example, Schrödinger's cat would be alive in one universe and dead in the other universe.”

Quantum physicists say that this is exactly what happens. The ongoing, infinite production of the multiverse would, therefore, be an ongoing act of creation caused by observation continuously collapsing probability wave, continuously forcing subatomic particle from a quantum superposition representing all possibilities open to them, not to a single outcome, but to a single outcome in a single universe; it would also cause every other possibility represented by the probability wave to occur in every universe where the same event is being observed.

Enter time:
​If all time is simultaneous, than our nature as conscious beings could also be described as our nature as quantum-superposition beings; consider the Scrodinger’s Cat thought experiment:
“One can even set up quite ridiculous cases. A cat is penned up in a steel chamber, along with the following device (which must be secured against direct interference by the cat): in a Geiger counter, there is a tiny bit of radioactive substance, so small, that perhaps in the course of the hour one of the atoms decays, but also, with equal probability, perhaps none; if it happens, the counter tube discharges and through a relay releases a hammer that shatters a small flask of hydrocyanic acid. If one has left this entire system to itself for an hour, one would say that the cat still lives if meanwhile no atom has decayed. The psi-function of the entire system would express this by having in it the living and dead cat (pardon the expression) mixed or smeared out in equal parts.

It is typical of these cases that an indeterminacy originally restricted to the atomic domain becomes transformed into macroscopic indeterminacy, which can then be resolved by direct observation. That prevents us from so naively accepting as valid a "blurred model" for representing reality. In itself, it would not embody anything unclear or contradictory. There is a difference between a shaky or out-of-focus photograph and a snapshot of clouds and fog banks.

—Erwin Schrödinger, Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics), Naturwissenschaften (translated by John D. Trimmer in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society)”
While I would argue that the cat’s consciousness would probably play some role in the timing of the wave’s collapse, the main point is this: by this reasoning, when we enter a period in which the cat may or may not be dead, then its living or dead status has not been observed, and the cat herself exists in a superposition — that is, if you will, neither zero (dead) nor one (alive), but both, simultaneously.

If all time is simultaneous, then we humans are simultaneously one (alive) during our lifespans and zero (dead) outside our lifespans. Meaning that we, and all forms of life, are beings who exist in superposition, spread out across time and the multiverse, expressing every potentiality that could ever be — indeed, creating every such potentiality.

Because if our nature is that of conscious beings inhabiting a multiverse of endless possibilities, where we are quantum-superposition beings, all of this actually adds up to us creating the multiverse by observing parts of it, while perceiving time and space only within the limitations of our immediately observable, three-spatial/one-time-dimensional universe.



Jønathan Lyons is an affiliate scholar for the IEET. He is also a transhumanist parent, an essayist, and an author of experimental fiction both long and short. He lives in central Pennsylvania and teaches at Bucknell University. His fiction publications include Minnows: A Shattered Novel.